Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 467

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila

Open access
Götz, Karl Geokg·1964·Kybernetik

Abstract

SummaryThe optical properties of the compound eye of Drosophila have been analysed using the optomotor reactions of flies with normal and mutant eye pigmentation. The stimulus was provided by cylindrical patterns with different periodic intensity distributions rotating at different speeds. The response consists of a torque about the vertical axis and was recorded under conditions of fixed flight. (Maximum reaction is about 0.04 dyn · cm). The transfer characteristics of the optical system are determined by the inter-ommatidial angle Δϕ, influencing the resolving power and by the width of the visual field of single ommatidia Δρ, influencing the response at high spatial frequencies. The values Δϕ = 4.6° and Δρ= 3.5° are obtained from stimulus-response experiments with Drosophila. They are independent of the presence of screening pigments. Differences in the response of flies with strong (+, se), weak (wa), and missing (w) pigmentation can be explained by the increased amount of scattered light in the pigment-deficient eyes. The overall intensities in the equally illuminated receptors are expected to be in the ratio 1∶1∶8∶25, respectively. The perception of motion depends only on the temporal, not on the spatial phase relations between periodic intensity variations in neighbouring ommatidia. Therefore the inhomogeneous distribution of the inter-ommatidial angle Δϕ changes the resolving power in different parts of the eye without changing the response to motion. Different simultaneous stimuli of equal strength in different parts of the eye are averaged in the perceptive system of Drosophila according to the number of ommatidia in these parts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00288561

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Autrum, H.: Die spektrale Empfindlichkeit der Augenmutation white-apricot von Calliphora. Biol. Zbl. 74, 515 (1955); - Die Sehschärfe pigmentfreier Facettenaugen von Calliphora erythrocephala. Biol. Zbl. 80, 1 (1961).
  2. Barlow, H. B.: The size of ommatidia in apposition eyes. J. exp. Biol. 29, 667 (1952). · doi:10.1242/jeb.29.4.667
  3. Demerec, M.: Biology of Drosophila. New York: John Wiley & Sons 1950.
  4. Enoch, J. M.: Optical properties of the retinal receptors. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 53, 71 (1963). · DOI
  5. Ephrussi, B.: Studies of eye pigments of Drosophila. Genetics 30, 71 (1945). · doi:10.1093/genetics/30.1.71
  6. Exner, S.: Die Physiologie der facettierten Augen von Krebsen und Insekten. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke 1891.
  7. Fermi, G., u. W. Reichardt: Optomotorische Reaktionen der Fliege Musca domestica. Kybernetik 2, 15 (1963). · DOI
  8. Fernández-Morán, H.: Fine structure of the light receptors in the compound eye of insects. Exp. Cell Res., Suppl. 5, 586 (1958).
  9. Fingerman, M.: The role of the eye-pigments of Drosophila melanogaster in photic orientation. J. exp. Zool. 120, 131 (1952). · doi:10.1002/jez.1401200106
  10. Gaffron, M.: Untersuchungen über das Bewegungssehen bei Libellenlarven, Fliegen und Fischen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 20, 299 (1934). · doi:10.1007/bf00361440
  11. Gavel, L. v.: Die „kritische Streifenbreite” als Maß der Sehschärfe bei Drosophila melanogaster. Z. vergl. Physiol. 27, 80 (1939). · doi:10.1007/bf00340525
  12. Hassenstein, B.: Ommatidienraster und afferente Bewegungsintegration. Z. vergl. Physiol. 33, 301 (1951); - Über die Wahrnehmung von Figuren und unregelmäßigen Helligkeitsmustern. Z. vergl. Physiol. 40, 556 (1958a); - Die Stärke von optokinetischen Reaktionen auf verschiedene Mustergeschwindigkeiten. Z. Naturforsch. 13b, 1 (1958b); - Optokinetische Wirksamkeit bewegter periodischer Muster. (Nach Messungen am Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis). Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 659 (1959); - Hassenstein, B., u. W. Reichardt: Systemtheoretische Analyse der Zeit-, Reihenfolgen und Vorzeichenauswertung bei der Bewegungsperzeption des Rüsselkäfers Chlorophanus. Z. Naturforsch, 11b, 513 (1956). · doi:10.1007/bf00339334
  13. Hecht, S., and G. Wald: The visual acuity and intensity discrimination of Drosophila. J. gen. Physiol. 17, 517 (1934). · doi:10.1085/jgp.17.4.517
  14. Hertweck, H.: Anatomie und Variabilität des Nervensystems und der Sinnesorgane von Drosophila melanogaster. Z. wiss. Zool. 139, 559 (1931).
  15. Hertz, M.: Zur Physiologie des Formen- und Bewegungssehens. Auflösungsvermögen des Bienenauges und Optomotorische Reaktion. Z. vergl. Physiol. 21, 579 (1935). · doi:10.1007/bf00340622
  16. Johannsen, O. A.: Eye structure in normal and eye-mutant Drosophilas. J. Morphol. and Physiol. 39, 337 (1924). · doi:10.1002/jmor.1050390203
  17. Kalmus, H.: The optomotor responses of some eye mutants of Drosophila. J. Genet. 45, 206 (1943); - Optomotor responses in Drosophila und Musca. Physiol. comp. (śGrav.) 1, 127 (1949). · DOI
  18. Kirschfeld, K., u. W. Reichardt: Die Verarbeitung stationärer optischer Nachrichten im Komplexauge von Limulus (Ommatidien-Sehfeld und räumliche Verteilung der Inhibition). Kybernetik 2, Heft 2 (1964). · doi:10.1007/bf00288558
  19. Kühn, A.: Die Orientierung der Tiere im Raum. Jena: Gustav Fischer 1919.
  20. Kuiper, J. W.: The optics of the compound eye. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 16, 58 (1962).
  21. Kunze, P.: Untersuchung des Bewegungssehens fixiert fliegender Bienen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 44, 656 (1961). · DOI
  22. Mittelstaedt, H.: Zur Analyse physiologischer Regelungssysteme. Verh. dtsch. Zool. Ges. in Wilhelmshaven 8, 150 (1951).
  23. Nolte, D. J.: The eye pigmentary system of Drosophila. J. Genet. 50, 79 (1950). · doi:10.1007/bf02986797
  24. Power, M. E.: The brain of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Morph. 72, 517 (1943). · DOI
  25. Reichardt, W.: Autokorrelations-Auswertung als Funktionsprinzip des Zentralnervensystems (bei der optischen Wahrnehmung eines Insekts). Z. Naturforsch. 12b, 448 (1957); - Nervous integration in the facet eye. Biophys. J. 2 (part 2), 121 (1961a); - Nervöse Verarbeitung optischer Nachrichten im Facettenauge. Jb. der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft S, 97 (1962). · DOI
  26. Reichardt, W., u. D. Varjú: Übertragungseigenschaften im Auswertesystem für das Bewegungssehen (Folgerungen aus Experimenten an dem Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis). Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 674 (1959). · DOI
  27. Varjú, D.: Optomotorische Reaktionen auf die Bewegung periodischer Helligkeitsmuster. (Anwendung der Systemtheorie auf Experimente am Rüsselkäfer Chlorophanus viridis.) Z. Naturforsch. 14b, 724 (1959). · DOI
  28. Viscontini, M.: Ptérines et génétique chez drosophila melanogaster. Industr. Chim. Beige 10, 1181 (1960).
  29. Waddington, C. H.: The ultra-structure of the developing eye of Drosophila. Proc. royal Soc. B. 153, 155 (1960).
  30. Wald, G., and G. Allen: Fractionation of the eye pigments in Drosophila melanogaster. J. gen. Physiol. 30, 41 (1946). · doi:10.1085/jgp.30.1.41
  31. Waterman, T. H.: Directional sensitivity of single ommatidia in the compound eye of Limulus. Proc. nat. Acad. Sci. (Wash.) 40, 252 (1954). · doi:10.1073/pnas.40.4.252
  32. Wolken, J. J.: Structure and molecular organization of retinal photoreceptors. J. opt. Soc. Amer. 53, 1 (1963). · doi:10.1364/josa.53.000001

Cited by

See all 467

Metadata

Authors
Götz, K. G.
Venue
Kybernetik
Published
1964-06
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
77-92
ISSN
0023-5946 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1554231835
Cited by
467
References
0
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
green
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00288561
The paper
Götz, K. G. (1964). Optomotorische Untersuchung des visuellen systems einiger Augenmutanten der Fruchtfliege Drosophila. Kybernetik. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00288561

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.