Cited by 122Animal Vocal Communication and BehaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAvian ecology and behavior

Sound degradation as a distance cue in great tit (Parus major) song

McGregor, P. K., Krebs, J. R.·1984·Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00293103

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If the receiver can perceive the vocalization's directionality, then appropriate posture might also help to specify the intended recipient of the signal.

    “If the receiver can perceive the vocalization's directionality, then appropriate posture might also help to specify the intended recipient of the signal (McGregor and Krebs, 1984; Richards, 1981).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McGregor, P. K., & Krebs, J. R.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
Published
1984-11
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
49-56
ISSN
  • 0340-5443 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0762
OpenAlex
W1973948342
Cited by
122
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Avian ecology and behavior
Keywords
Parus major, distance cues, song perception, acoustic communication, song learning, song performance, territorial song, playback experiments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review