The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The role of litter in an old-field community: impact of litter quantity in different seasons on plant species richness and abundance
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Secondary succession and the pattern of plant dominance along experimental nitrogen gradients
Tilman, D. (1987) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/2937080 · Cited by 1,076 · cited 4×
“Fertilization experiments generally increase productivity and decrease diversity (e.g., Bakelaar and Odum 1978; Tilman 1987; Carson and Barrett 1988).”
BackgroundInfluential
Cited by
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Species richness in a successional grassland: effects of nitrogen enrichment and plant litter
Foster, B. L., & Gross, K. L. (1998) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[2593:sriasg]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 501
Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass
Lamb, E. G. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0393.1 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Carson, W. P., & Peterson, C. J.
- Venue
- Oecologia
- Published
- 1990-11
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 8-13
- ISSN
- 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1939
- OpenAlex
- W2150780433
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
