The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Are some plant life forms more effective than others in screening out ultraviolet-B radiation?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial ecosystems
Caldwell, M. M., Björn, L. O., Bornman, J. F., Flint, S. D., Kulandaivelu, G., Teramura, A. H., & Tevini, M. (1998) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/s1011-1344(98)00184-5 · Cited by 550
Effects of UV-B radiation on photosynthesis and growth of terrestrial plants
Teramura, A. H., & Sullivan, J. H. (1994) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/bf00014599 · Cited by 490
Effects of UV-B Radiation on Terrestrial and Aquatic Primary Producers
Day, T. A., & Neale, P. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150434 · Cited by 211
Self-citationResponses of plants in polar regions to UVB exposure: a meta‐analysis
NEWSHAM, K. K., & ROBINSON, S. A. (2009) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01944.x · Cited by 175
Repair of DNA Damage Induced by Solar UV
Britt, A. B. (2004) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1023/b:pres.0000035035.12340.58 · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Day, T. A., Vogelmann, T. C., & DeLucia, E. H.
- Venue
- Oecologia
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513-519
- ISSN
- 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1939
- OpenAlex
- W2042494625
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are some plant life forms more effective than others in screening out ultraviolet-B radiation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf00317843
- The paper
- Day, T. A., Vogelmann, T. C., & DeLucia, E. H. (1992). Are some plant life forms more effective than others in screening out ultraviolet-B radiation? Oecologia. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00317843
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
