Cited by 119Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Thorn-shaped astrocytes: possibly secondarily induced tau-positive glial fibrillary tangles

Ikeda, K., Akiyama, H., Kondo, H., Haga, C., Tanno, E., Tokuda, T., Ikeda, S.·1995·Acta Neuropathologica

Abstract

Argyrophilic and tau-positive abnormal structures occurring in glial cells are called glial fibrillary tangles. In the astrocyte, a conspicuous tau-positive structure is known to appear in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). In this report, another type of argyrophilic and tau-positive astrocytes is reported. The morphology of this new type is quite different from that of the previously reported tau-positive astrocyte in PSP and they are designated here as thorn-shaped astrocytes (TSA). TSA have an apparently argyrophilic cytoplasm with a few short processes and often have a small eccentric nucleus, whose appearance resembles that of a reactive astrocyte. Immunohistochemically, TSA are positive to anti-tau antibodies but are negative for ubiquitin. Simultaneous immunostaining revealed the coexistence of tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein epitopes in the same cytoplasm. Electron microscopically, bundles of 15-nm straight tubules were included in the cytoplasm together with abundant glial filaments. In the vicinity of a cluster of TSA, related structures of perivascular or subpial tau-positive linings, which correspond to astrocytic end-feet, are sometimes observed. In almost all cases, a few TSA are generally located in a confined area of subpial and subependymal regions. Although TSA appear to be intimately associated with some diseases, they are also found in a wide range of cytoskeletal disorders including the aged brain with neurofibrillary tangles. TSA are presumed to be a secondary induced product in relation to astrocytic reaction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00318575

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 119

Authors
Ikeda, K., Akiyama, H., Kondo, H., Haga, C., Tanno, E., Tokuda, T., & Ikeda, S.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry (JP)
  • Shinshu University (JP)
Venue
Acta Neuropathologica
Published
1995-12
Volume
90
Issue
6
Pages
620-625
ISSN
  • 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0533
OpenAlex
W2018505720
Cited by
119
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
progressive supranuclear palsy, reactive astrocytes, glial fibrillary acidic protein, tau protein, neurofibrillary tangles, brain aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Astrocytes, Cytoskeleton, Female, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Middle Aged, Neuroglia, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review