Thorn-shaped astrocytes: possibly secondarily induced tau-positive glial fibrillary tangles
Abstract
Argyrophilic and tau-positive abnormal structures occurring in glial cells are called glial fibrillary tangles. In the astrocyte, a conspicuous tau-positive structure is known to appear in progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). In this report, another type of argyrophilic and tau-positive astrocytes is reported. The morphology of this new type is quite different from that of the previously reported tau-positive astrocyte in PSP and they are designated here as thorn-shaped astrocytes (TSA). TSA have an apparently argyrophilic cytoplasm with a few short processes and often have a small eccentric nucleus, whose appearance resembles that of a reactive astrocyte. Immunohistochemically, TSA are positive to anti-tau antibodies but are negative for ubiquitin. Simultaneous immunostaining revealed the coexistence of tau and glial fibrillary acidic protein epitopes in the same cytoplasm. Electron microscopically, bundles of 15-nm straight tubules were included in the cytoplasm together with abundant glial filaments. In the vicinity of a cluster of TSA, related structures of perivascular or subpial tau-positive linings, which correspond to astrocytic end-feet, are sometimes observed. In almost all cases, a few TSA are generally located in a confined area of subpial and subependymal regions. Although TSA appear to be intimately associated with some diseases, they are also found in a wide range of cytoskeletal disorders including the aged brain with neurofibrillary tangles. TSA are presumed to be a secondary induced product in relation to astrocytic reaction.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tau deposition can be observed in the astrocyte nucleus in AD brain.
“Although tau primarily accumulates in neurons, tau deposition can also be observed in the astrocyte nucleus in AD brain [432, 433].”
From Molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (2020) · cites this paper as [433]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 18 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Ikeda, K., Akiyama, H., Kondo, H., Haga, C., Tanno, E., Tokuda, T., & Ikeda, S.
- Affiliations
- Tokyo Institute of Psychiatry (JP)
- Shinshu University (JP)
- Venue
- Acta Neuropathologica
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 620-625
- ISSN
- 0001-6322 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0533
- OpenAlex
- W2018505720
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Acta Neuropathologica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- progressive supranuclear palsy, reactive astrocytes, glial fibrillary acidic protein, tau protein, neurofibrillary tangles, brain aging
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Astrocytes, Cytoskeleton, Female, Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Middle Aged, Neuroglia, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review