The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The interpretation of biological motion
Open accessAbstract
The term biological motion has been coined by Johansson (1973) to refer to the ambulatory patterns of terrestrial bipeds and quadripeds. In this paper a computational theory of the visual perception of biological motion is proposed. The specific problem addressed is how the three dimensional structure and motions of animal limbs may be computed from the two dimensional motions of their projected images. It is noted that the limbs of animals typically do not move arbitrarily during ambulation. Rather, for anatomical reasons, they typically move in single planes for extended periods of time. This simple anatomical constraint is exploited as the basis for utilizing a “planarity assumption” in the interpretation of biological motion. The analysis proposed is: (1) divide the image into groups of two or three elements each; (2) test each group for pairwise-rigid planar motion; (3) combine the results from (2). Fundamental to the analysis are two “structure from planar motion” propositions. The first states that the structure and motion of two points rigidly linked and rotating in a plane is recoverable from three orthographic projections. The second states that the structure and motion of three points forming two highed rods constrained to move in a plane is recoverable from two orthographic projections. The psychological relevance of the analysis and possible interactions with top down recognition processes are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detecting Pedestrians Using Patterns of Motion and Appearance
Viola, P., Jones, M. J., & Snow, D. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-005-6644-8 · Cited by 2,079
Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements
Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1057 · Cited by 955
Epipolar-plane image analysis: An approach to determining structure from motion
Bolles, R. C., Baker, H. H., & Marimont, D. H. (1987) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/bf00128525 · Cited by 892
Motion-based recognition a survey
Cédras, C., & Shah, M. (1995) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/0262-8856(95)93154-k · Cited by 406
Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions.
Viviani, P., & Stucchi, N. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.18.3.603 · Cited by 398
Global Processing of Biological Motions
Bertenthal, B. I., & Pinto, J. (1994) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00504.x · Cited by 355
(2008) · Cited by 61
Ezzat, M. A., Abd El Ghany, M. A., Almotairi, S., & Salem, M. A.-M. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21093222 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoffman, D. D., & Flinchbaugh, B. E.
- Venue
- Biological Cybernetics
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 195-204
- ISSN
- 0340-1200 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0770
- OpenAlex
- W1570914610
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.