Interaction of the yeast pleiotropic drug resistance genes PDR1 and PDR5
Abstract
The network of genes which mediates multiple drug resistance in yeast includes, among others, the PDR1 gene, which encodes a putative regulator of gene expression, and PDR5, a locus whose amplification leads to resistance. We demonstrate that disruption of PDR5 causes marked hypersensitivity not only to cycloheximide but also to sulphometuron methyl and the mitochondrial inhibitors chloramphenicol, lincomycin, erythromycin and antimycin. Genetic analysis of double mutants containing an insertion in PDR5 (pdr5:Tn5), which renders cells hypersensitive to cycloheximide, and a pdr1 mutation, which confers resistance to this inhibitor, indicates that the expression of resistance requires a functional PDR5 gene. The same interdependency is observed for chloramphenicol, but not for oligomycin, lincomycin, erythromycin or sulphometuron methyl. Northern analysis of PDR1 and PDR5 transcripts reveals that the 5.2 kbp PDR5 transcript is overexpressed in pdr1 (resistant) mutants, but underexpressed in a disruption of PDR1. These observations provide strong experimental support for our former proposal that the PDR5 gene is a target for regulation by the PDR1 gene product.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hyperactivation of Pdr1 or Pdr3 is the main cause of overexpression of PDR5 leading to drug resistance.
“Hyperactivation of Pdr1 or Pdr3 is the main cause of overexpression of PDR5 leading to drug resistance.”
From SWI/SNF and the histone chaperone Rtt106 drive expression of the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance network genes (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
Hyperactivation of Pdr1 or Pdr3 can be caused by gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in PDR1 or PDR3.
“Such hyperactivation can be caused by gain-of-function (GOF) mutations in PDR1 or PDR314,15 or mitochondrial dysfunction (e.g. loss of the mitochondrial genome), the latter of which only stimulates Pdr3-dependent gene expression16.”
From SWI/SNF and the histone chaperone Rtt106 drive expression of the Pleiotropic Drug Resistance network genes (2022) · cites this paper as [14]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 156
- Authors
- Meyers, S., Schauer, W., Balzi, E., Wagner, M., Goffeau, A., & Golin, J.
- Affiliations
- Catholic University of America (US)
- UCLouvain (BE)
- ORCID
- Golin, John
- Venue
- Current Genetics
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 431-436
- ISSN
- 0172-8083 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0983
- OpenAlex
- W2094328836
- Cited by
- 156
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (1r15gm041875-01)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM41875)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
- Keywords
- pleiotropic drug resistance, PDR1, PDR5, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cycloheximide resistance, mitochondrial inhibitors, chloramphenicol, gene expression regulation, transcriptional regulation, gene amplification, double mutants
- MeSH terms
- Anti-Bacterial Agents, DNA Transposable Elements, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Genes, Fungal, Mutation, Yeasts, Blotting, Southern, Blotting, Northern, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review