Cited by 156Fungal and yeast genetics researchDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Interaction of the yeast pleiotropic drug resistance genes PDR1 and PDR5

Meyers, Shirley, Schauer, Wren, Balzi, Elisabetta, Wagner, Marisa, Goffeau, André, Golin, John·1992·Current Genetics

Abstract

The network of genes which mediates multiple drug resistance in yeast includes, among others, the PDR1 gene, which encodes a putative regulator of gene expression, and PDR5, a locus whose amplification leads to resistance. We demonstrate that disruption of PDR5 causes marked hypersensitivity not only to cycloheximide but also to sulphometuron methyl and the mitochondrial inhibitors chloramphenicol, lincomycin, erythromycin and antimycin. Genetic analysis of double mutants containing an insertion in PDR5 (pdr5:Tn5), which renders cells hypersensitive to cycloheximide, and a pdr1 mutation, which confers resistance to this inhibitor, indicates that the expression of resistance requires a functional PDR5 gene. The same interdependency is observed for chloramphenicol, but not for oligomycin, lincomycin, erythromycin or sulphometuron methyl. Northern analysis of PDR1 and PDR5 transcripts reveals that the 5.2 kbp PDR5 transcript is overexpressed in pdr1 (resistant) mutants, but underexpressed in a disruption of PDR1. These observations provide strong experimental support for our former proposal that the PDR5 gene is a target for regulation by the PDR1 gene product.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00351651

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 156

Authors
Meyers, S., Schauer, W., Balzi, E., Wagner, M., Goffeau, A., & Golin, J.
Affiliations
  • Catholic University of America (US)
  • UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
Current Genetics
Published
1992-05
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
431-436
ISSN
  • 0172-8083 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0983
OpenAlex
W2094328836
Cited by
156
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r15gm041875-01)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM41875)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
pleiotropic drug resistance, PDR1, PDR5, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, cycloheximide resistance, mitochondrial inhibitors, chloramphenicol, gene expression regulation, transcriptional regulation, gene amplification, double mutants
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, DNA Transposable Elements, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Genes, Fungal, Mutation, Yeasts, Blotting, Southern, Blotting, Northern, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review