Cited by 66Crustacean biology and ecologyIsotope Analysis in EcologyInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Food and feeding rates of the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille)

Abstract

Food preferences and feeding rates of Armadillidium vulgare were measured with leaf litter from nine species of plant from a grassland heath. Litter from dicotyledonous plants was significantly preferred to that from monocotyledonous and bryophyte species but preferences for monocotyledonous litter increased as this decayed.For a given state of decay consumption and absorption rates were highest for dicotyledonous foods. Decayed monocotyledonous foods were consumed and absorbed at a greater rate than standing dead foods. The decayed dicotyledonous material was also consumed more rapidly than the standing dead food but the absorption rate was not significantly different because the decayed food was absorbed less efficiently.It is suggested that A. vulgare maintains high absorption rates on some low quality foods by increasing consumption rate but that its ability to do this depends upon which defences were used by the plants when alive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00377189

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 66

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Al Dabbagh KY, Block W (1981) The population ecology of a terrestrial isopod in two breckland grass heaths. J Anim Ecol 50:61?77 · DOI
  2. Beck SO (1975) Resistance of plants to insects. Ann Rev Entomol 10:205?232
  3. Calow P (1975) The feeding strategies of two freshwater gastropods Ancylus fluviatilis (Mull) and Planorbis contortus (Linn) Pulmonata in terms of ingestion rates and absorption efficiencies. Oecologia (Berlin) 20:33?49 · DOI
  4. Dunger W (1958) Über die Zersetzung der Laubsten durch die Boden-Makrofauna im Auenwald. Zool Jb (Syst) 86:129?180
  5. Edney EB, Allen W, Macfarlane J (1974) Predation by terrestrial isopods. Ecology 55:428?433 · DOI
  6. Feeny PP (1975) Biochemical coevolution between plants and their insect herbivores, p 3?19 in Gilbert LE, Raven PH (eds) Coevolution of Animals and Plants. University of Texas Press · DOI
  7. Harborne JB (1977) Introduction to Ecological Biochemistry. Academic Press
  8. Hassall M (1976) Studies on the biology of Philoscia muscorum (Crustacea: Isopoda) with particular reference to its role in a dune grassland ecosystem. Ph D Thesis, University of Leeds, Leeds, England
  9. Hassall M (1977) Consumption of leaf litter by the terrestrial isopod Philoscia muscorum in relation to food availability in a dune grassland ecosystem. Ecol Bull (Stockholm) 25:550?553
  10. Hubbell SP (1971) Of Sowbugs and Systems: the ecological bioenergetics of a terrestrial isopod. Systems Analysis and Stimulation in Ecology, Vol I. Patten BC (ed) Academic Press, New York and London 269?324 · DOI
  11. Levins DA (1966) Trichomes in plant defence. Quart Rev Biol 48:3?15 · DOI
  12. Neuhauser EF, Hartenstein R (1978) Phenolic content and palatability of leaves and wood to soil isopods and diplopods. Pedobiologia 18:99?109 · DOI
  13. Paris OH (1973) The ecology of Armadillidium vulgare (Isopoda; Oniscoidea) in California grassland: food, enemies and weather. Ecol Monogr 33:1?22 · DOI
  14. Paris OH, Sikora A (1965) Radiotracer demonstration of isopod herbivory. Ecology 46:729?734 · DOI
  15. Rushton SP (1981) The effects of food quality on the population dynamics Armadillidium vulgare (Latreille). Ph D Thesis, University of East Anglia, Norwich, England
  16. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1969) Biometry. WH Freeman and Company, San Francisco
  17. Sutton SL (1972) Woodlice. Ginn and Company Ltd., London
  18. Watt AS (1940) Studies in the ecology of Breckland, IV the grass heath. J Ecol 28:42?70 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Rushton, S. P., & Hassall, M.
Affiliations
University of East Anglia (GB)
Venue
Oecologia
Published
1983-03
Volume
57
Issue
3
Pages
415-419
ISSN
  • 0029-8549 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1939
OpenAlex
W2037114190
Cited by
66
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Oecologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Crustacean biology and ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Keywords
Armadillidium vulgare, terrestrial isopods, food preferences, feeding rate, leaf litter, plant decay, dicotyledonous plants, monocotyledonous plants, bryophytes, consumption rate, absorption rate, plant chemical defense

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review