Cited by 75Pancreatic function and diabetesNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Hyperinsulinaemia is not linked with blood pressure elevation in patients with insulinoma

Open access
Sawicki, P. T., Heinemann, L., Starke, A., Berger, M.·1992·Diabetologia

Abstract

We have investigated the hypothesis that insulin is a causal and independent risk factor for blood pressure elevation in humans by comparing pre- and post-operative blood pressure values of 34 consecutive patients with histologically-confirmed diagnosis of insulinoma and 34 age- and sex-matched control patients. In patients with insulinoma hypoglycaemic symptoms were present for 18 (9-36) months. (Values are given as median and 95% confidence interval or mean and SD). After removal of insulinoma fasting plasma insulin levels decreased from 22 (16-28) mU/l to 11 (6-20) mU/l (p less than 0.003) and minimal fasting plasma glucose concentrations increased from 2.5 (2.0-3.0) to 4.4 (4.2-5.7) mmol/l (p less than 0.002) while blood pressure values remained unchanged. Body mass index before operation was comparable between the groups: 25.5 (5.4) kg/m2 in insulinoma patients and 24.8 (4.7) kg/m2 in control subjects. Pre-operative and post-operative blood pressure values did not differ between the groups, being (systolic/diastolic) 133 (18)/82 (9) mm Hg in insulinoma patients and 128 (15)/78 (10) mm Hg in control subjects before and 129 (19)/80 (10) mm Hg and 125 (11)/76 (7) after surgery. Chronic hyperinsulinaemia in patients with insulinoma is not associated with a detectable elevation of blood pressure values. Correction of hyperinsulinaemia after surgery for insulinoma does not result in blood pressure changes. These results argue against the hypothesis that insulin is an independent causal factor in the development of essential hypertension in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00400257

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 75

Authors
Sawicki, P. T., Heinemann, L., Starke, A., & Berger, M.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1992-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
649-652
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2000379309
Cited by
75
References
33
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
insulinoma, hyperinsulinemia, blood pressure, essential hypertension, insulin, hypoglycemia, fasting insulin, fasting blood glucose, body mass index
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Female, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Hypertension, Hypoglycemia, Insulinoma, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review