Cited by 119Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Treatment and Management

Islet amyloid polypeptide in diabetic and non-diabetic Pima Indians

Open access
Clark, A., Saad, M. F., Nezzer, T., Uren, C., Knowler, W. C., Bennett, P. H., Turner, R. C.·1990·Diabetologia

Abstract

Islet amyloid may have a pathological role in the development of Type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. The prevalence of islet amyloid has been investigated on post-mortem pancreatic tissue from both diabetic and non-diabetic Pima Indian subjects who had previously been assessed by oral glucose tolerance tests. Islets were examined for amyloid deposits and for cellular immunoreactivity to pancreatic hormones and islet amyloid polypeptide, the constituent peptide of islet amyloid. Twenty of 26 diabetic subjects (77%) had islet amyloid, compared with one of 14 non-diabetic subjects (7%). Twelve of the diabetic subjects (46%) had amyloid in more than 10% of their islets, whereas only 4% of islets were affected in a single non-diabetic subject. Positive immunoreactivity for islet amyloid peptide was present in the islet amyloid and in islet cells in 54% of the diabetic and 50% of the non-diabetic subjects. Islet amyloid in diabetic Pima Indians may indicate a primary Beta-cell defect which interacts with insulin resistance to produce diabetes, or may develop as a result of Beta-cell dysfunction induced by insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00403322

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 119

Authors
Clark, A., Saad, M. F., Nezzer, T., Uren, C., Knowler, W. C., Bennett, P. H., & Turner, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1990-05
Volume
33
Issue
5
Pages
285-289
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2079403467
Cited by
119
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
amylin, islet amyloid, type 2 diabetes, Pima Indians, pancreatic islets, beta-cell dysfunction, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia
MeSH terms
Aged, Amyloid, Arizona, Autopsy, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Indians, North American, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreas, Reference Values, Islet Amyloid Polypeptide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review