Specificity of velocity in strength training
Abstract
Twenty-one male volunteers (ages 23-25 years) were tested pre- and post training for maximal knee extension power at five specific speeds (1.05, 2.09, 3.14, 4.19, and 5.24 rad X s-1) with an isokinetic dynamometer. Subjects were assigned randomly to one of three experimental groups; group S, training at 1.05 rad X s-1 (n = 8), group I, training at 3.14 rad X s-1 (n = 8) or group F, training at 5.24 rad X s-1 (n = 5). Subjects trained the knee extensors by performing 10 maximal voluntary efforts in group S, 30 in group I and 50 in group F six times a week for 8 weeks. Though group S showed significant increases in power at all test speeds, the percent increment decreased with test speed from 24.8% at 1.05 rad X s-1 to 8.6% at 5.24 rad X s-1. Group I showed almost similar increment in power (18.5-22.4 at all test speeds except at 2.09 rad X s-1 (15.4%). On the other hand, group F enhanced power only at faster test speeds (23.9% at 4.19 rad X s-1 and 22.8% at 5.24 rad X s-1).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies examining the effect of movement velocity on neuromuscular performance were conducted on isokinetic equipment.
“Most of the studies examining the eff ect of movement velocity on neuromuscular performance were conducted on isokinetic equipment [ 4 , 21 ]”
From Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance (2014) · cites this paper as [21]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 11 · Cited by 172
- Authors
- Kanehisa, H., & Miyashita, M.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- ORCID
- Kanehisa, Hiroaki
- Venue
- European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology
- Published
- 1983-11
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 104-106
- ISSN
- 0020-9376 (ISSN-L)
- 0301-5548
- 1439-6327
- OpenAlex
- W2070916713
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 3.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Applied Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
- Keywords
- resistance training, training specificity, isokinetic knee extension, knee extensors, muscle power, training speed, maximal voluntary contraction
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Physical Exertion, Humans, Knee, Male, Muscle Contraction, Physical Education and Training, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review