Perseveration and rotational behavior elicited by d-amphetamine in a Y-maze exploratory task: Differential effects of intraperitoneal and unilateral intraventricular administration
Abstract
Mice received either intraperitoneal (1.0, 3.0, 5.0, or 15.0 mg/kg) or unilateral intraventricular injection (50.0, 100.0 or 200.0 microgram) of d-amphetamine. Both routes of injection produced circling behavior in a dose-related fashion when animals were tested in a circular alley-way. In contrast, performance in a free running Y-maze alternation task was differentially affected by the route of administration. Whereas intraperitoneal injection induced perseveration (i.e., animals consecutively visited only two arms of the maze), intraventricular injection augmented alternation behavior normally seen in saline-treated mice. It was suggested that Y-maze performance following intraventricular d-amphetamine injection reflects response perseveration, whereas systemic d-amphetamine treatment produced stimulus perseveration (repetition of location rather than direction). Moreover d-amphetamine-induced circling produced by intraperitoneal administration probably is an artifact of drug-induced stimulus perseveration as opposed to motor biases observed following intraventricular injections.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several lines of evidence have shown that d-amphetamine causes significantly perseverative patterns (i.e., repetition of location rather than direction) in exploration in the Y-maze.
“In addition, several lines of evidence have shown that d-amphetamine causes significantly perseverative patterns (i.e., repetition of location rather than direction) in exploration in the Y-maze (43, 44).”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jian-min, C., Zhi-yuan, W., Shi-xuan, W., Rui, S., Ning, W., & Jin, L. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.885574 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
“In addition, several lines of evidence have shown that d-amphetamine causes significantly perseverative patterns (i.e., repetition of location rather than direction) in exploration in the Y-maze (43, 44).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Kokkinidis, L., & Anisman, H.
- Affiliations
- Carleton University (CA)
- Venue
- Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1977
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-128
- ISSN
- 0033-3158 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2072
- OpenAlex
- W1981161068
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
- Keywords
- d-amphetamine, perseveration, intraventricular injection, intraperitoneal administration, route of administration, circling behavior, response perseveration, mice
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Dextroamphetamine, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Humans, Injections, Intraperitoneal, Injections, Intraventricular, Motor Activity, Stereotyped Behavior, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review