The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative light and electron microscopic study of retinal histogenesis in normal and rd mutant mice
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The renewal of photoreceptor cell outer segments
Young, R. W. (1967) · The Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.33.1.61 · Cited by 1,184
Cited by
Circadian photoreception in the retinally degenerate mouse (rd/rd)
Foster, R. G., Provencio, I., Hudson, D., Fiske, S., De Grip, W., & Menaker, M. (1991) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00198171 · Cited by 508
Olaparib significantly delays photoreceptor loss in a model for hereditary retinal degeneration
Sahaboglu, A., Barth, M., Secer, E., Amo, E. M. D., Urtti, A., Arsenijevic, Y., Zrenner, E., & Paquet-Durand, F. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep39537 · Cited by 53
Ahuja, S., Ahuja-Jensen, P., Johnson, L. E., Caffe´, A. R., Abrahamson, M., Ekstro¨m, P. A. R., & van Veen, T. (2008) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.07-0549 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanyal, S., & Bal, A. K.
- Venue
- Zeitschrift f�r Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte
- Published
- 1973
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 219-238
- ISSN
- 0340-2061 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0568
- OpenAlex
- W1995580942
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
