Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Forelimb regeneration from different levels of amputation in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens: Length, rate, and stages

Open access
Iten, Laurie E., Bryant, Susan V.·1973·Wilhelm Roux' Archiv f�r Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen

Abstract

Summary1.Some aspects of the influence of position on regeneration have been examined by comparing regeneration from two different levels along the newt forelimb.2.We have defined a series of stages of forelimb regeneration in the newt,Notophthalmus viridescens, in order to facilitate this study.3.Limbs amputated at either a proximal level (through the humerus) or a distal level (through the radius and ulna) pass through the same stages at the same times after amputation.4.The histological sequence of events of digit regeneration was compared with that of limb regeneration from a proximal level of amputation and was found to be the same.5.In limbs amputated at either proximal or distal levels, the rate of elongation of regenerates is the same during the phases of dedifferentiation, blastema accumulation, and blastema growth.6.During the phase of differentiation and morphogenesis, the rate of elongation of regenerates from the proximal level is significantly greater than that of regenerates from the distal level.7.The total length of regenerates from proximal and distal levels along the limb is significantly different.8.The results indicate that positional information does not influence the developmental sequence of events of limb regeneration, but that it does influence the rate of growth of the regenerate and the specification of the structures to be replaced.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00575834

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Iten, L. E., & Bryant, S. V.
Venue
Wilhelm Roux' Archiv f�r Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen
Published
1973
Volume
173
Issue
4
Pages
263-282
ISSN
  • 0043-5546 (ISSN-L)
  • 0949-944X
  • 1432-041X
OpenAlex
W1981691440
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.