Cited by 11Mental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesHealth and Well-being Studies

Are life events which cause each other additive in their effects?

Miller, P. M., Ingham, J. G.·1985·Social Psychiatry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00595046

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, P. M., & Ingham, J. G.
Affiliations
Royal Edinburgh Hospital (GB)
Venue
Social Psychiatry
Published
1985
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
31-41
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 0037-7813
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2017063293
Cited by
11
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1
FWCI
2.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
life events, causal chains, additive effects, anxiety, depression, psychological distress, matched pairs
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adjustment Disorders, Anxiety Disorders, Humans, Life Change Events, Risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review