E-Type pronouns and donkey anaphora

Heim, Irene·1990·Linguistics and Philosophy

DOI 10.1007/bf00630732

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00630732

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

On Quantifier Domain Restriction
Stanley, J., & Gendler Szabó, Z. (2000) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/1468-0017.00130 · Cited by 1,074
Logic in Grammar: Polarity, Free Choice, and Intervention
Chierchia, G. (2013) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697977.001.0001 · Cited by 445
The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure
(2016) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642670.001.0001 · Cited by 423
Discourse Representation Theory
Kamp, H., Van Genabith, J., & Reyle, U. (2011) · Handbook of Philosophical Logic · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-0485-5_3 · Cited by 370
Non-configurationality in Australian aboriginal languages
Austin, P., & Bresnan, J. (1996) · Natural Language and Linguistic Theory · doi:10.1007/bf00133684 · Cited by 337
Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints
Spivey-Knowlton, M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00647-4 · Cited by 299

Authors: Heim, I.
Venue: Linguistics and Philosophy
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1990-04
Volume: 13
Issue: 2
Pages: 137-177
ISSN: 0165-0157 (ISSN-L)
1573-0549
DOI: 10.1007/bf00630732
OpenAlex: W1987184627
Cited by: 790
References: 0
FWCI: 28.53
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review