Cited by 297Probability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Mechanics and EntropyBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The well-posed problem

Jaynes, E. T.·1973·Foundations of Physics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00709116

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The probability computations are not in the realm of the Bertrand paradox because the method of random selection is well specified by a simple combinatorial formula in which all combinations can be numerically assayed.

    “These probability computations are not in the realm of the Bertrand paradox [247], as the method of random selection is very well specified by a simple combinatorial formula, in which all combinations can be numerically assayed.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. E. T. Jaynes, Prior probabilities,IEEE Trans. Systems Sci. Cybernetics SSC-4 (3), 227?241 (1968). · DOI
  2. J. Bertrand,Calcul des probabilités (Gauthier-Villars, Paris, 1889), pp. 4?5.
  3. E. Borel,Éléments de la théorie des probabilités (Hermann et Fils, Paris, 1909), pp. 110?113.
  4. H. Poincaré,Calcul des probabilités (Paris, 1912), pp. 118?130.
  5. J. V. Uspensky,Introduction to Mathematical Probability (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1937), p. 251.
  6. E. P. Northrup,Riddles in Mathematics (van Nostrand, New York, 1944), pp. 181?183.
  7. B. V. Gnedenko,The Theory of Probability (Chelsea Publ. Co., New York, 1962), pp. 40?41.
  8. M. G. Kendall and P. A. P. Moran,Geometrical Probability (Hafner Publ. Co., New York, 1963), p. 10.
  9. W. Weaver,Lady Luck: the Theory of Probability (Doubleday-Anchor, Garden City, New York, 1963), pp. 356?357.
  10. R. von Mises, inMathematical Theory of Probability and Statistics, H. Geiringer, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1964), pp. 160?166.
  11. R. von Mises,Probability, Statistics and Truth (Macmillan, New York, 1957).
  12. F. Mosteller,Fifty Challenging Problems in Probability (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 1965), p. 40.
  13. E. P. Wigner,Gruppentheorie und ihre Anwendung auf die Quantenmechanik der Atomspektren (Fr. Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1931). · DOI
  14. H. Weyl,The Classical Groups (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1946).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jaynes, E. T.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Jaynes, E. T.
Venue
Foundations of Physics
Published
1973-12
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
477-492
ISSN
  • 0015-9018 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-9516
OpenAlex
W1966767328
Cited by
297
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Foundations of Physics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Statistical Mechanics and Entropy
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Keywords
Bertrand paradox, well-posedness, maximum entropy, transformation groups, frequency interpretation of probability, probability distributions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review