Cited by 58Geophysics and Gravity MeasurementsGNSS positioning and interferenceHistorical Geography and Cartography

Separation between reference surfaces of selected vertical datums

Rapp, Richard H.·1994·Bulletin Géodésique

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00807989

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a single tide-gauge per datum gives rise to offsets among various vertical datums globally.

    “This gives rise to offsets among various vertical datums on a global scale (e.g., Rapp, 1994;Burša et al., 2004).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapp, R. H.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Rapp, Richard H.
Venue
Bulletin Géodésique
Published
1994-03
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
26-31
ISSN
  • 0949-7714 (ISSN-L)
  • 0007-4632
  • 1432-1394
OpenAlex
W2085088235
Cited by
58
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Geodesy (publishedVersion)
Funders
USAF Phillips Laboratory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › GNSS positioning and interference
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Historical Geography and Cartography
Keywords
vertical datum, geoid undulation, ellipsoidal height, orthometric height, Doppler positioning, North American Vertical Datum of 1988, Australian Height Datum, gravity field

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review