Cited by 43Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

Different types of centrally acting antihypertensives and their targets in the central nervous system

van Zwieten, P. A., Chalmers, J. P.·1994·Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy

Abstract

The central regulation of blood pressure and other cardiovascular parameters may involve the baroreceptor reflex are, including both adrenergic and serotonergic pathways, as well as amino acids, as neurotransmitters. Both adrenergic and serotonergic pathways have been recognized as targets for clinically relevant, centrally acting antihypertensives, such as clonidine, guanfacine, and alpha-methyl-DOPA. The central components of the hybrid drugs urapidil and ketanserin also involve serotonergic pathways and receptors. For urapidil the stimulation of 5-HT1A-receptors is assumed to induce peripheral sympathoinhibition, whereas for ketanserin the central mechanism is unknown in detail. More recently central imidazoline (I1) receptors have been proposed as the major target for the newer antihypertensives rilmenidine and moxonidine. Clonidine, however, is assumed to be mixed I1- and alpha2-receptor agonist. The distinction between central I1- and alpha2-receptors may potentially offer the design of new antihypertensives, acting like clonidine but with fewer side effects. Finally, the amino acid pathways should be considered as potential targets for centrally acting antihypertensives. Experimental compounds on this basis are available but clinical implications appear to be very remote. In the present survey an outline is given of the various pathways, neurotransmitters, and receptors involved in the central regulation of blood pressure. The different types of centrally acting antihypertensives are subsequently discussed on this basis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00877397

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 43

Authors
van Zwieten, P. A., & Chalmers, J. P.
Affiliations
Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
Venue
Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
Published
1994-12
Volume
8
Issue
6
Pages
787-799
ISSN
  • 0920-3206 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7241
OpenAlex
W2054175057
Cited by
43
References
63
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
central blood pressure regulation, baroreflex, adrenergic pathways, serotonergic pathways, 5-HT1A receptor, urapidil, ketanserin, imidazoline I1 receptor, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, clonidine, guanfacine, methyldopa, rilmenidine, moxonidine, amino acid neurotransmitters, sympathoinhibition
MeSH terms
Animals, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Central Nervous System, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review