Different types of centrally acting antihypertensives and their targets in the central nervous system
Abstract
The central regulation of blood pressure and other cardiovascular parameters may involve the baroreceptor reflex are, including both adrenergic and serotonergic pathways, as well as amino acids, as neurotransmitters. Both adrenergic and serotonergic pathways have been recognized as targets for clinically relevant, centrally acting antihypertensives, such as clonidine, guanfacine, and alpha-methyl-DOPA. The central components of the hybrid drugs urapidil and ketanserin also involve serotonergic pathways and receptors. For urapidil the stimulation of 5-HT1A-receptors is assumed to induce peripheral sympathoinhibition, whereas for ketanserin the central mechanism is unknown in detail. More recently central imidazoline (I1) receptors have been proposed as the major target for the newer antihypertensives rilmenidine and moxonidine. Clonidine, however, is assumed to be mixed I1- and alpha2-receptor agonist. The distinction between central I1- and alpha2-receptors may potentially offer the design of new antihypertensives, acting like clonidine but with fewer side effects. Finally, the amino acid pathways should be considered as potential targets for centrally acting antihypertensives. Experimental compounds on this basis are available but clinical implications appear to be very remote. In the present survey an outline is given of the various pathways, neurotransmitters, and receptors involved in the central regulation of blood pressure. The different types of centrally acting antihypertensives are subsequently discussed on this basis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Guanfacine has little affinity for the brainstem imidazoline I1 receptors that contribute to the potent hypotensive actions of clonidine.
“and little affinity for the brainstem imidazoline I1 receptors that contribute to the potent hypotensive actions of clonidine (van Zwieten and Chalmers, 1994).”
From Catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical function: Relevance to treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and related disorders (2011) · cites this paper as van Zwieten and Chalmers, 1994
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 63 · Cited by 43
- Authors
- van Zwieten, P. A., & Chalmers, J. P.
- Affiliations
- Flinders Medical Centre (AU)
- ORCID
- Chalmers, J. P.
- Venue
- Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 787-799
- ISSN
- 0920-3206 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7241
- OpenAlex
- W2054175057
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 63
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 0.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Keywords
- central blood pressure regulation, baroreflex, adrenergic pathways, serotonergic pathways, 5-HT1A receptor, urapidil, ketanserin, imidazoline I1 receptor, alpha-2 adrenergic agonists, clonidine, guanfacine, methyldopa, rilmenidine, moxonidine, amino acid neurotransmitters, sympathoinhibition
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Central Nervous System, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review