Adsorption of amino acid entantiomers by Na-montmorillonite
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Asymmetric adsorption and polymerization of amino acids reported with kaolinite and bentonite actually originated from experimental errors or contaminations.
“Asymmetric adsorption and polymerization of amino acids reported with kaolinite [266][267][268][269][270] and bentonite [271][272][273] in the 1970s-1980s actually originated from experimental errors or contaminations.”
From Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality (2022) · cites this paper as [273]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Friebele, E., Shimoyama, A., Hare, P. E., & Ponnamperuma, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Venue
- Origins of Life
- Published
- 1981
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 173-184
- ISSN
- 0169-6149 (ISSN-L)
- 0302-1688
- 1573-0875
- OpenAlex
- W2060433556
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2022: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Clay minerals and soil interactions
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- amino acid enantiomers, montmorillonite, clay adsorption, chiral recognition, prebiotic chemistry, amino acid adsorption
- MeSH terms
- Clay, Adsorption, Alanine, Aluminum Silicates, Amino Acids, Bentonite, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Stereoisomerism, Valine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review