The Dysfunctional Attitude Scale: how well can it measure depressive thinking
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The RSE has internal consistency alpha above .80.
“Its internal consistency alpha is above .80. [27]”
From The more it is needed, the less it is wanted: Attitudes toward face-to-face intervention among depressed patients undergoing online treatment (2013) · cites this paper as [27]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 21 · Cited by 87
- Authors
- Nelson, L. D., Stern, S. L., & Cicchetti, D. V.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- ORCID
- Stern, Stephen L.
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
- Published
- 1992-09
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-223
- ISSN
- 0164-0305 (ISSN-L)
- 0882-2689
- 1573-3505
- OpenAlex
- W2047372769
- Cited by
- 87
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Keywords
- Dysfunctional Attitude Scale, dysfunctional cognitions, depression, psychometric properties, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, validity, maladaptive thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
