The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Public‐Value Failure: When Efficient Markets May Not Do
Bozeman, B. (2002) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00165 · Cited by 550
A Framework for Evaluating Environmental Policy Instruments: Context and Key Concepts
Mickwitz, P. (2003) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/135638900300900404 · Cited by 249
Governing policy evaluation? Towards a new typology
Schoenefeld, J., & Jordan, A. (2017) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389017715366 · Cited by 81
Why do we still need participatory technology assessment?
Hennen, L. (2012) · Poiesis & Praxis · doi:10.1007/s10202-012-0122-5 · Cited by 49
Conditional Objectivism: A Strategy for Connecting the Social Sciences and Practical Decision-Making
Reber, R., & Bullot, N. J. (2019) · Theory and History in the Human and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33099-6_5 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Alb�k, E.
- Venue
- Policy Sciences
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 79-100
- ISSN
- 0032-2687 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0891
- OpenAlex
- W2324795963
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01000821
- The paper
- Alb�k, E. (1995). Between knowledge and power: Utilization of social science in public policy making. Policy Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01000821
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
