Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gambling environments are robustly full of cues, such as flashing lights and sounds.
“Gambling environments are robustly full of cues, such as flashing lights and sounds (Griffiths, 1993; Noseworthy & Finlay, 2009; Parke & Griffiths, 2006), and gamblers have been shown to display greater attentional bias and fixate their gaze for longer on gambling-related cues (Hudson, Olatunji, Gough, Yi, & Stewart, 2016; McGrath, Meitner, & Sears, 2018).”
From Cued for Risk: Evidence for an Incentive Sensitization Framework to Explain the Interplay between Stress and Anxiety, Substance Abuse, and Reward Uncertainty in Disordered Gambling Behavior (2019) · cites this paper as Griffiths, 1993
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 390
- Authors
- Griffiths, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Griffiths, Mark
- ORCID
- Griffiths, Mark
- Venue
- Journal of Gambling Studies
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 101-120
- ISSN
- 1050-5350 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-3602
- OpenAlex
- W2094382346
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 3.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Gambling Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Keywords
- structural properties, excessive gambling, gambling addiction, near misses, winning probability, gambling policy, reinforcement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
