CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103Insect Pheromone Research and ControlForest Insect Ecology and ManagementInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Limonene inhibits attraction to ?-pinene in the pine weevilsHylobius abietis andH. pinastri

Nordlander, G�ran·1990·Journal of Chemical Ecology
DOI 10.1007/bf01021028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The field responses ofHylobius abietis (L.) andH. pinastri (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) to various combinations of two host monoterpenes and ethanol were studied using baited pitfall traps. Both species were attracted to α-pinene, and when ethanol was added the attraction increased by 5-16 times. Limonene completely inhibited the attraction to α-pinene, even when the release rate of limonene was only about 1/50 that of α-pinene. The catches in traps with α-pinene and limonene as well as with limonene alone were similar in size to catches in empty control traps, i.e., no true repellent effect was demonstrated. When limonene was added to the combination of α-pinene and ethanol on old clear-cuttings, the catch ofH. pinastri was completely inhibited while that ofH. abietis was reduced by two thirds. On fresh clear-cuttings the inhibitory effect of limonene on the attraction to the α-pinene-ethanol combination was small or absent. Some aspects of host interactions are discussed as are practical implications regarding the choice of seedling material for planting and prospects of finding deterrents for protecting seedlings from pine weevil damage.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01021028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Alfaro, R.I., Pierce, H.D. Jr., Borden, J.H., andOehlschlager, A.C. 1980. Role of volatile and nonvolatile components of Sitka spruce bark as feeding stimulants forPissodes strobi Peck (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Can. J. Zool. 58:626?632. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bordasch, R.P., andBerryman, A.A. 1977. Host resistance to the fir engraver beetle,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). 2. Repellency ofAbies grandis resins and some monoterpenes.Can. Entomol. 109:95?100. · DOI
  3. Brunberg, B., Fries, C., Samuelsson, H., andThorsÉn, Å. 1986. [Artificial regeneration in southern Sweden-conditions, problems and opportunities].Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten, Redogörelser 1986(5): 1?142. [In Swedish with English summary.]
  4. Coyne, J.F., andLott, L.H. 1976. Toxicity of substances in pine oleoresin to southern pine beetles.J. Ga. Entomol. Soc. 11:301?305.
  5. Dethier, V.G., Barton Browne, L., andSmith, C.N. 1960. The designation of chemicals in terms of the responses they elicit from insects.J. Econ. Entomol. 53:134?136. · DOI
  6. Eidmann, H.H. 1974.Hylobius Schönh., pp. 275?293,in W. Schwenke (ed.). Die Forstschädlinge Europas 2. Paul Parey, Hamburg.
  7. Eidmann, H.H. 1981. Pine weevil research for better reforestations, pp. 441?447,in Proceedings, 17th IUFRO World Congress, Kyoto, Division 2.
  8. Eidmann, H.H. 1987. Attractants and deterrents of natural origin for the suppression of bark beetle attacks, pp. 56?62,in Proceedings, European Seminar on Wood Production and Harvesting, Bologna, Vol. 3.
  9. Gilmore, A.R. 1977. Effects of soil moisture stress on monoterpenes in loblolly pine.J. Chem. Ecol. 3:667?676. · DOI
  10. Heemann, V., andFrancke, W. 1977. Gaschromatografisch-massenspektrometrische Untersuchungen der flüchtigen Rindeninhaltsstoffe vonPicea abies (L.) Karst.Planta Med. 32:342?346. · DOI
  11. Långström, B. 1982. Abundance and seasonal activity of adult Hylobius-weevils in reforestation areas during the first years following final felling.Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 106:1?23.
  12. Nordlander, G. 1987. A method for trappingHylobius abietis (L.) with a standardized bait and its potential for forecasting seedling damage.Scand. J. For. Res. 2:199?213. · DOI
  13. Nordlander, G., Eidmann, H.H., Jacobsson, U., Nordenhem, H., andSjödin, K. 1986. Orientation of the pine weevilHylobius abietis to underground sources of host volatiles.Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:91?100. · DOI
  14. Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1982. Accumulation of monoterpenes and associated volatiles following inoculation of grand fir with a fungus transmitted by the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae).Can. Entomol. 114:797?810. · DOI
  15. Raffa, K.F., andBerryman, A.A. 1987. Interacting selective pressures in conifer-bark beetle systems: A basis for reciprocal adaptations?Am. Nat. 129:234?262. · DOI
  16. Raffa, K.F., Berryman, A.A., Simasko, J., Teal, W., andWong, B.L. 1985. Effects of grand fir monoterpenes on the fir engraver,Scolytus ventralis (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), and its symbiotic fungus.Environ. Entomol. 14:552?556. · DOI · Paper page
  17. Rudnew, D.F., andSmeljanez, W.P. 1969. Ursachen der Massenvermehrung einiger Forstschädlingsarten.Anz. Schaedlingskde. Pflanzenschutz 42:177?184.
  18. Selander, J., andKalo, P. 1979. [Evaluation of resistance of Scots pine seedlings against the large pine weevil,Hylobius abietis L. (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) in relation to their monoterpene composition.]Silva Fenn. 13:115?130. [In Finnish with English summary.] · DOI
  19. Selander, J., Kangas, E., Perttunen, V., andOksanen, H. 1973. Olfactory responses ofHylobius abietis L. (Col., Curculionidae) to substances naturally present in pine phloem or their synthetic counterparts.Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 39:40?45.
  20. Selander, J., Kalo, P., Kangas, E., andPerttunen, V. 1974. Olfactory behaviour ofHylobius abietis L. (Col., Curculionidae). I. Response to several terpenoid fractions isolated from Scots pine phloem.Ann. Entomol. Fenn. 40:108?115.
  21. Smith, R.H. 1965. Effect of monoterpene vapors on the western pine beetle.J. Econ. Entomol. 58:509?510. · DOI
  22. Smith, R.H. 1966. The monoterpene composition ofPinus ponderosa xylem resin and ofDendroctonus brevicomis pitch tubes.For. Sci. 12:63?68.
  23. Smith, R.H. 1969. Xylem resin as a factor in the resistance of pines to forced attacks by bark beetles, pp. 1?13,in Second World Consultation on Forest Tree Breeding, Washington, D.C. FAO International Union of Forestry Research Organizations.
  24. Squillace, A.E. 1976. Analyses of monoterpenes of conifers by gas-liquid chromatography, pp. 139?157,in J.P. Miksche (ed.). Modern Methods in Forest Genetics. Springer-Verlag, New York.
  25. Sturgeon, K.B. 1979. Monoterpene variation in ponderosa pine xylem resin related to western pine beetle predation.Evolution 33:803?814. · DOI
  26. Tilles, D.A., Nordlander, G., Nordenhem, H., Eidmann, H.H., Wassgren, A.-B., andBergström, G. 1986a. Increased release of host volatiles from feeding scars: A major cause of field aggregation in the pine weevilHylobius abietis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).Environ. Entomol. 15:1050?1054. · DOI
  27. Tilles, D.A., Sjödin, K., Nordlander, G., andEidmann, H.H. 1986b. Synergism between ethanol and conifer host volatiles as attractants for the pine weevil,Hylobius abietis (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae).J. Econ. Entomol. 79:970?973. · DOI
  28. Tilles, D.A., Eidmann, H.H., andSolbreck, B. 1988. Mating stimulant of the pine weevilHylobius abietis (L.).J. Chem. Ecol. 14:1495?1503. · DOI
  29. Werner, R.A. 1972. Aggregation behaviour of the beetleIps grandicollis in response to hostproduced attractants.J. Insect Physiol. 18:423?437. · DOI
  30. Yazdani, R., andNilsson, J.-E. 1986. Cortical monoterpene variation in natural populations ofPinus sylvestris in Sweden.Scand. J. For. Res. 1:85?93. · DOI
  31. Yazdani, R., Nilsson, J.E., andEricsson, T. 1985. Geographical variation in the relative proportion of monoterpenes in cortical oleoresin ofPinus sylvestris in Sweden.Silvae Genet. 34:201?208.
  32. Zar, J.H. 1974. Biostatistical Analysis, 1st ed. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nordlander, G.
Affiliations
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
Nordlander, G�ran
Venue
Journal of Chemical Ecology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1990-04
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
1307-1320
ISSN
  • 0098-0331 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1561
DOI
10.1007/bf01021028
OpenAlex
W2992471025
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Chemical Ecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
limonene, α-pinene, pine weevil, Hylobius abietis, host plant attraction, ethanol, monoterpenes, repellent effect, seedling protection, clear-cutting, host plant relationships, seedling planting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review