Cited by 13Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The Victorian creation of Buddhism

Open access
Silk, Jonathan A.·1994·Journal of Indian Philosophy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01061755

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jonathan Silk argued that in Indian Buddhism there is no evidence that there was any kind of Buddhist monk other than one associated with a Sectarian ordination lineage.

    “there is no evidence that there was any kind of Buddhist monk other than one associated with a Sectarian [i.e., nik aya ] ordination lineage.”

    From Early Indian Mahāyāna Buddhism I: Recent Scholarship (2010) · cites this paper as Silk 1994

    The section titled “The Victorian Creation of Buddhism” discusses claims about the Mahāyāna’s lay orientation and interpretations of Buddhist monasticism, but does not address whether every Indian Buddhist monk belonged to a sectarian ordination lineage. Searches for “Sectarian ordination lineage,” “nikāya,” and “ordination” found no passage establishing the attributed claim; page numbers were unavailable in the indexed copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. "Bodhisattva and Layman in the Early MahfiyLna," Japanese Religions 16/3 (1991): 1--16. Page 4.
  2. Although I believe he has never published this opinion, referring to it only in personal conversations, Prof. Durt has repeatedly mentioned that Lamotte's efforts to place emphasis on the lay-orientation of the Mah~y~na were related to his position vis-~t-vis contemporary lay efforts to modernize the Roman Catholic church in Europe (we are talking here of the days before Vatican II), and free it from its priestly domination. Certainly this is an issue which deserves further study, especially given the great influence the ideas of Prof. Lamotte have had on modern Buddhist studies, an influence which is growing with the continued translation of his works into English. 21 Paul Harrison, "Buddhism: A Religion of Revelation After All?" Numen 34/2 (1987): 257, in a review article on Peter Masefield's Divine Revelation in Pali Buddhism. Colombo: The Sri Lanka Institute of Traditional Studies, and London:
  3. The locus classicus for this notion is found in Bharati's paper "The Hindu Renaissance and its Apologetic Patterns," Journal of Asian Studies 29/2 (1970): 267--87, especially page 273.
  4. I thank Gregory Schopen for the reference to this published expression of Bharati's idea. 23 Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
  5. As far as I noticed, however, the authors do not refer to Bharati or the "pizza effect" by name, although many of the phenomena they describe could be accurately classified as instances of this phenomenon. 24 See "Archaeology and Protestant Presuppositions in the Study of Indian Buddhism," History of Religions 31/1 (1991): 1--23.

Metadata

Authors
Silk, J. A.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Silk, Jonathan A.
Venue
Journal of Indian Philosophy
Published
1994-06
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
171-196
ISSN
  • 0022-1791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-0395
OpenAlex
W1976113319
Cited by
13
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Indian Philosophy (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Buddhism, Victorian era, colonial India, colonialism, reception of Buddhism, Buddhism in the West

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review