Insurer ambiguity and market failure
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies illustrate that uncertainty about losses and ambiguity about probability often lead to higher premiums.
“Studies illustrate that uncertainty about losses and ambiguity about probability often lead to higher premiums (Kunreuther, Hogarth and Meszaros, 1993).”
From An analysis of interpretation of insurance contracts: common law versus strict contra proferentem (2023) · cites this paper as Kunreuther, Hogarth and Meszaros, 1993
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An analysis of interpretation of insurance contracts: common law versus strict contra proferentem
Cole, C., & Henry, R. (2023) · Journal of Insurance Regulation · doi:10.52227/23499.2017 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kunreuther, H., Hogarth, R., & Meszaros, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Temple University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
- Published
- 1993-08
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-87
- ISSN
- 0895-5646 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0476
- OpenAlex
- W4236783780
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Insurance and Financial Risk Management
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural risk and resilience
- Keywords
- ambiguity aversion, premium setting, market failure, risk aversion, insurance companies, reinsurers, underwriters, reference points, expected loss, bankruptcy risk, catastrophic risk, risk assessment, government insurance programs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
