Evoked potentials and the study of sentence comprehension

Garnsey, Susan M., Tanenhaus, Michael K., Chapman, Robert M.·1989·Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

DOI 10.1007/bf01069046

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01069046

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C., Pearlmutter, N. J., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.676 · Cited by 2,259
Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly
Osterhout, L., & Holcomb, P. J. (1992) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/0749-596x(92)90039-z · Cited by 1,856
The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, E., & Holcomb, P. (2000) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/016909600386084 · Cited by 993
Syntactic and thematic constraint effects on blood oxygenation level dependent signal correlates of comprehension of relative clauses
Caplan, D., Stanczak, L., & Waters, G. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20044 · Cited by 82

Authors: Garnsey, S. M., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Chapman, R. M.
Venue: Journal of Psycholinguistic Research
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1989-01
Volume: 18
Issue: 1
Pages: 51-60
ISSN: 0090-6905 (ISSN-L)
1573-6555
DOI: 10.1007/bf01069046
OpenAlex: W2029011284
Cited by: 303
References: 0
FWCI: 4.12
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review