Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science

Etzkowitz, Henry·1984·Minerva

DOI 10.1007/bf01097964

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01097964

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
Merton, R. K. (1988) · Isis · doi:10.1086/354848 · Cited by 1,397
Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level
Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1070.0295 · Cited by 912
The Third Mission of the university: A systematic literature review on potentials and constraints
Compagnucci, L., & Spigarelli, F. (2020) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120284 · Cited by 892
Digital academic entrepreneurship: The potential of digital technologies on academic entrepreneurship
Rippa, P., & Secundo, G. (2019) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.013 · Cited by 361
Why are some university researchers more likely to create spin-offs than others? Evidence from Canadian universities
Landry, R., Amara, N., & Rherrad, I. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.020 · Cited by 305
Entrepreneurial universities: A bibliometric analysis within the business and management domains
Forliano, C., De Bernardi, P., & Yahiaoui, D. (2021) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120522 · Cited by 298
Mapping research specialties
Morris, S. A., & Van der Veer Martens, B. (2008) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2008.1440420113 · Cited by 280
The changing university business model: a stakeholder perspective
Miller, K., McAdam, M., & McAdam, R. (2014) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12064 · Cited by 253
Scientists' Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Self-Reported Misbehaviors
Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.51 · Cited by 180

Authors: Etzkowitz, H.
Venue: Minerva
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1984
Volume: 21
Issue: 2-3
Pages: 198-233
ISSN: 0026-4695 (ISSN-L)
1573-1871
DOI: 10.1007/bf01097964
OpenAlex: W2014049116
Cited by: 673
References: 0
FWCI: 13.98
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review