Cited by 30Relativity and Gravitational TheoryPhilosophy, Science, and HistoryAdvanced Differential Geometry Research

Did Einstein Stumble? The debate over general covariance

Norton, John D.·1995·Erkenntnis

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01128809

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • General relativity is not the only covariant theory of spacetime.

    “General relativity is not the only covariant theory of spacetime (Norton 1995).”

    From The Fine-Tuning of the Universe for Intelligent Life (2012) · cites this paper as Norton 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norton, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Norton, John D.
Venue
Erkenntnis
Published
1995-03
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
223-245
ISSN
  • 0165-0106 (ISSN-L)
  • 1572-8420
OpenAlex
W1998524764
Cited by
30
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Erkenntnis (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy, Science, and History
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Advanced Differential Geometry Research
Keywords
general covariance, general relativity, Albert Einstein, principle of relativity, philosophy of physics, foundations of general relativity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review