Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 364EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesECG Monitoring and AnalysisNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spatial patterns underlying population differences in the background EEG

Abstract

A method is described which can be used to extract common spatial patterns underlying the EEGs from two human populations. These spatial patterns account, in the least-squares sense, maximally for the variance in the EEGs from one population and minimally for the variance in the other population and therefore would seem to be optimal for quantitatively discriminating between the individual EEGs in the two populations. By using this method, it is suggested that the problems associated with the more common approach to discriminating EEGs, significance probability mapping, can be avoided. The method is tested using EEGs from a population of normal subjects and using the EEGs from a population of patients with neurologic disorders. The results in most cases are excellent and the misclassification which occurs in some cases is attributed to the nonhomogeneity of the patient population particularly. The advantages of the method for feature selection, for automatically classifying the clinical EEG, and with respect to the reference-free nature of the selected features are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01129656

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Cited by

Items 301–364 of 364

Metadata

Authors
Koles, Z. J., Lazar, M. S., & Zhou, S. Z.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Venue
Brain Topography
Published
1990
Volume
2
Issue
4
Pages
275-284
ISSN
  • 0896-0267 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6792
OpenAlex
W2082070408
Cited by
364
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Topography (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
common spatial pattern, EEG classification, population differences, EEG background activity, feature selection, neurological disorders, misclassification
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Brain Diseases, Brain Mapping, Electrodes, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review