The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On CHF calculations of second-order magnetic properties using the method of continuous transformation of origin of the current density
Open accessAbstract
SummaryA fully analytical formulation is outlined for computing molecular magnetic susceptibilities and nuclear magnetic shieldings via a continuous change of origin of the electronic current density induced by an external magnetic field. The change of origin is described in terms of a (continuous) arbitrary shift functiond(r). Coupled Hartree-Fock second-order magnetic properties of CH4 and CO2 molecules have been computed, using the special choiced(r)=r as generating function. A detailed analysis of results obtained with a variety of basis sets reveals that such a method is not as good as previously suggested. Large basis sets must be used to obtain accurate magnetic properties. On the other hand, all the components of theoretical nuclear magnetic shielding evaluated via this approach are independent of the origin of the vector potential. In general, theoretical magnetic susceptibilities depend linearly on the distance between different coordinate frames, but are origin independent for centre-symmetric molecules.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions
Krishnan, R., Binkley, J. S., Seeger, R., & Pople, J. A. (1980) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.438955 · Cited by 17,772
Cited by
Magnetic criteria of aromaticity
Gershoni-Poranne, R., & Stanger, A. (2015) · Chem. Soc. Rev. · doi:10.1039/c5cs00114e · Cited by 494
Steiner, E., & Fowler, P. W. (2001) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/jp011955m · Cited by 459
Induced magnetic fields in aromatic [n]-annulenes—interpretation of NICS tensor components
Corminboeuf, C., Heine, T., Seifert, G., Schleyer, P. V. R., & Weber, J. (2004) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/b313383b · Cited by 458
Calculations of magnetically induced current densities: theory and applications
Sundholm, D., Fliegl, H., & Berger, R. J. F. (2016) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1270 · Cited by 373
The Induced Magnetic Field in Cyclic Molecules
Merino, G., Heine, T., & Seifert, G. (2004) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200400457 · Cited by 340
Double Aromaticity and Ring Currents in All‐Carbon Rings
Fowler, P. W., Mizoguchi, N., Bean, D. E., & Havenith, R. W. A. (2009) · Chemistry – A European Journal · doi:10.1002/chem.200900322 · Cited by 99
Ring currents in six-membered heterocycles: the diazaborinines (CH)2B2N2
Cernusak, I., Fowler, P. W., & Steiner, E. (2000) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970050032792 · Cited by 81
Compernolle, S., Chibotaru, L. F., & Ceulemans, A. (2006) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/jp063947h · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Coriani, S., Lazzeretti, P., Malagoli, M., & Zanasi, R.
- Venue
- Theoretica Chimica Acta
- Published
- 1994-10
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 181-192
- ISSN
- 1432-2234 (ISSN-L)
- 0040-5744
- OpenAlex
- W2054497898
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.