Gamete intrafallopian transfer vs superovulation with intrauterine insemination for the treatment of infertility
Abstract
Superovulation with intrauterine insemination (SO-IUI) has been suggested as an alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), despite the absence of controlled or comparative trials. We retrospectively analyzed all GIFT and SO-IUI cycles performed concurrently from January 1985 to August of 1987 at a single university center. Pregnancy rates were significantly better for GIFT than SO-IUI (P less than 0.001), with an odds ratio of 3.25 (P = 0.001). Stepwise multiple logistic regression identified factors that correlate with pregnancy: absence of endometriosis (P = 0.05), infertility less than 3 years' duration (P = 0.002), TMS greater than or equal to 30 X 10(6) (P = 0.005), and treatment with GIFT rather than SO-IUI (P = 0.001). These data give a first approximation of the increased efficacy of GIFT versus SO-IUI and provide valuable insight into significant confounding variables to be considered when planning a randomized, prospective trial to evaluate these techniques.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a single cycle, IUI always will be less effective than IVF or GIFT.
“In a single cycle, IUI always will be less effective than IVF or GIFT (45,46).”
From Comparison of the sperm quality necessary for successful intrauterine insemination with World Health Organization threshold values for normal sperm (1999) · cites this paper as [46]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dickey, R. P., Pyrzak, R., Lu, P. Y., Taylor, S. N., & Rye, P. H. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(98)00519-6 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaplan, C. R., Olive, D. L., Sabella, V., Asch, R. H., Balmaceda, J. P., Riehl, R. M., Groff, T. R., Burns, W. N., & Schenken, R. S.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- ORCID
- Olive, David L.
- Venue
- Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer
- Published
- 1989-10
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 298-304
- ISSN
- 0740-7769 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-7330
- OpenAlex
- W2053920497
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Keywords
- gamete intrafallopian transfer, superovulation, intrauterine insemination, female infertility, pregnancy rate, endometriosis, tubal motility, confounding variables
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Infertility, Insemination, Artificial, Ovulation, Pregnancy, Regression Analysis, Retrospective Studies, Superovulation, Gamete Intrafallopian Transfer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review