An examination of overjustification under conditions of extended observation and multiple reinforcement: Overjustification or boredom?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Mynatt et al. (1978) study, the free-choice measure showed an effect size of d = -0.11 (CI -1.34, 1.14).
“In the Mynatt et al. study, the free-choice measure showed an effect size of d = -0.11 (CI = -1.34, 1.14)”
From A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. (1999) · cites this paper as Mynatt et al. (1978)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 6 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Mynatt, C., Oakley, T., Arkkelin, D., Piccione, A., Margolis, R., & Arkkelin, J.
- Affiliations
- Bowling Green State University (US)
- Venue
- Cognitive Therapy and Research
- Published
- 1978-06
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 171-177
- ISSN
- 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-2819
- OpenAlex
- W2027378866
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2016: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
- Keywords
- overjustification effect, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, boredom, free play, children, base rates, motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
