Cited by 195Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanismsMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Characterization of GABAergic neurons in hippocampal cell cultures

Benson, D. L., Watkins, F. H., Steward, O., Banker, G.·1994·Journal of Neurocytology

Abstract

The morphological characteristics of GABAergic neurons and the distribution of GABAergic synaptic terminals were examined in cultures of hippocampal neurons from 4-35 days in vitro. Neurons expressing GABA immunoreactivity represented about 6% of the total number of cultured neurons at all time points. Although the morphological characteristics of GABAergic cells suggested a heterogeneous population, GABAergic cells as a class were notably different from the non-GABAergic, presumably pyramidal cells. Most GABAergic cells had more fusiform or polygonal shaped somata, non-spiny and less tapering dendrites and appeared more phase-dense than nonGABAergic cells. Quantitative analysis revealed that GABAergic cells had fewer primary dendrites, more elongated dendritic arbors, and longer dendritic segments than non-GABAergic neurons-characteristics that are similar to GABAergic cells in situ. Double immunostaining revealed that GAD65-positive varicosities were also immunopositive for synapsin I, suggesting that GAD65-positive varicosities that contacted somata and dendrites represented presynaptic specializations. Confocal microscopy revealed the proportion of the synaptic specializations on the cell soma that were GAD65-positive was greater than on the dendrites, suggesting that somata and dendrites differ in their ability to induce the formation of presynaptic specializations by GABAergic axons. These data indicate that the GABAergic cells that develop in culture exhibit distinctiv…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01188497

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benson, D. L., Watkins, F. H., Steward, O., & Banker, G.
Affiliations
University of Virginia (US)
Venue
Journal of Neurocytology
Published
1994-05
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
279-295
ISSN
  • 0300-4864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-7381
OpenAlex
W2044049987
Cited by
195
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurocytology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32ns007199-15, 5r01ns023094-15)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NIMH NS07199, NS 23094)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD N01-HD-6-2915)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
GABAergic neurons, hippocampal neurons, neuronal morphology, dendritic morphology, GAD65, synapsin I, presynaptic specialization, synaptic terminals, GABA immunoreactivity, pyramidal neurons, in vitro neuronal culture, dendritic branching
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Dendrites, gamma-Aminobutyric Acid, Glutamate Decarboxylase, Hippocampus, Isoenzymes, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Synapses, Biomarkers, Synapsins, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Cell Size, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review