Treatment of clothing with a permethrin spray for personal protection against the western black-legged tick,Ixodes pacificus (Acari: Ixodidae)
Abstract
The synthetic pyrethroid, permethrin, when applied to clothing with a pressurized spray at an application rate estimated previously to be 4 micrograms a.i./cm2, was found to be 100% effective for personal protection against all three parasitic stages of the western black-legged tick, Ixodes pacificus Cooley and Kohls. This tick has been implicated as the primary vector of the Lyme disease spirochete (Borrelia burgdorferi) to humans in the far-western United States. Periods of exposure to permethrin-treated cloth as brief as 10 and 45 seconds incapacitated 100% of subadult and adult ticks, respectively, within 1-3 h post-treatment. Under field conditions, permethrin apparently does not repel questing adult ticks, though 100% of ticks recovered from treated clothing after exposures as brief as less than or equal to 15 seconds were moribund 1 h later.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The efficacy of permethrin-treated clothing against mosquitoes has been demonstrated in many laboratory studies and short-duration field trials.
“The efficacy of permethrin-treated clothing against mosquitoes has been demonstrated in many laboratory studies and short-duration field trials.[4,6,7,44,45,47–60]”
From Pyrethroid insecticides maintain repellent effect on knock-down resistant populations of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes (2018) · cites this paper as [4]
Cites
Schreck, C. E., Mount, G. A., & Carlson, D. A. (1982) · Journal of Economic Entomology · doi:10.1093/jee/75.6.1059 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bowman, N. M., Akialis, K., Cave, G., Barrera, R., Apperson, C. S., & Meshnick, S. R. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196410 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
- Authors
- Lane, R. S.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lane, R. S.
- Venue
- Experimental and Applied Acarology
- Published
- 1989-05
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 343-352
- ISSN
- 0168-8162 (ISSN-L)
- 1572-9702
- OpenAlex
- W1996912018
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Experimental and Applied Acarology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Arthritis Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Vector-borne infectious diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Dermatological diseases and infestations
- Keywords
- permethrin, Ixodes pacificus, personal protection, tick repellency, Lyme disease vector, Borrelia burgdorferi, pyrethroid insecticides, tick exposure
- MeSH terms
- Aerosols, Animals, Arachnid Vectors, Clothing, Female, Humans, Insecticides, Lyme Disease, Male, Pyrethrins, Tick Infestations, Ticks, Permethrin
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review