CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 85Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle InteractionsSpectral Theory in Mathematical PhysicsQuantum and Classical Electrodynamics

Regularized, continuum Yang-Mills process and Feynman-Kac functional integral

Asorey, M., Mitter, P. K.·1981·Communications in Mathematical Physics
DOI 10.1007/bf01213595
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01213595

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 15 · Cited by 85

Authors
Asorey, M., & Mitter, P. K.
Affiliations
Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Hautes Energies (FR)
ORCID
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1981-03
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
43-58
ISSN
  • 0010-3616 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0916
DOI
10.1007/bf01213595
OpenAlex
W2060396940
Cited by
85
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Communications in Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Keywords
Yang-Mills theory, ultraviolet regularization, gauge orbits, Hilbert manifolds, Riemannian metrics, Laplace-Beltrami operator, global diffusion, Yang-Mills Lagrangian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review