Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Counter-examples to the generalized positive action conjecture

LeBrun, Claude·1988·Communications in Mathematical Physics
DOI 10.1007/bf01221110
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01221110

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Derdzinski, A.: Compos. Math.49, 405?433 (1983)
  2. Eguchi, T., Hanson, A.J.: Ann. Phys.120, 82?106 (1979) · DOI
  3. Hawking, C. W., Pope, C. N.: Nucl. Phys.B146, 381?392 (1978) · DOI
  4. Hitchin, N. J.: Math. Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc.85, 465?476 (1979) · DOI
  5. Itoh, M.: Compos. Math.51, 265?273 (1984)
  6. LeBrun, C.: Proc. Am. Math. Soc.98, 637?640 (1986) · DOI
  7. Schoen, R., Yau. S.-T.: Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 547?548 (1979) · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 131

Metadata

Authors
LeBrun, C.
Venue
Communications in Mathematical Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1988-12
Volume
118
Issue
4
Pages
591-596
ISSN
  • 0010-3616
  • 1432-0916
DOI
10.1007/bf01221110
Cited by
131
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Counter-examples to the generalized positive action conjecture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01221110
The paper
LeBrun, C. (1988). Counter-examples to the generalized positive action conjecture. Communications in Mathematical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01221110

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.