Cited by 1,172Marxism and Critical TheoryCritical Theory and PhilosophyPhilosophical Thought and Analysis

Technik und Wissenschaft als ?Ideologie??

Habermas, J�rgen·1968·Man and World

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01247043

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Habermas, J.
Affiliations
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Corresponding author
Habermas, J�rgen
Venue
Man and World
Published
1968-11
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
483-523
ISSN
  • 0025-1534 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1103
OpenAlex
W2125663460
Cited by
1,172
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 33
FWCI
122.66
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
Continental Philosophy Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Theory and Philosophy
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Philosophical Thought and Analysis
Keywords
ideology, philosophy of technology, critique of technology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review