Cited by 20Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology ResearchChild Abuse and TraumaPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Abusive families and character formation

McCarthy, James B.·1990·The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

Abstract

Family research studies confirm that abusive parents tend to be undifferentiated partners who compete with each other and with their children for attention and nurturance. More or less healthy parents make demands on children to counteract their own injured narcissism, but they do so largely without devaluation and the sadistic use of projective identification. Under sufficient stress abusive parents attack the child who fails to gratify their needs, thereby giving vent to longstanding frustrations and feelings of being threatened by the child's individuation and competency. The emotional atmosphere in such families facilitates ego deficits like those of the borderline personality as it molds the child's efforts to avoid anxiety. Devaluation, loss, and defenses against mourning partially account for depression and paranoid traits in abused youngsters. Early neglect and abuse exposes them to influential models who act out rage and primitive defenses. Some abused individuals project their rage and later become paranoid or antisocial, whereas others fragment or retain infantile defenses. The destructiveness of severe psychological abuse lies in the constriction of the experiencing self and healthy character development, together with the conditioning to repeat abusive relationships and to avoid intimacy. Achieving individuation under these circumstances entails overcoming the internalized abusive relationships and relinquishing the unconscious wish to be transformed from the abused into the abuser.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01250913

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Winnicott, D. (1947). Hate in the countertransference. InThrough Paediatrics to Psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books. (Reprinted in 1975.)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
McCarthy, J. B.
Affiliations
Lenox Hill Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, James B.
Venue
The American Journal of Psychoanalysis
Published
1990-06
Volume
50
Issue
2
Pages
181-186
ISSN
  • 0002-9548 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-6741
OpenAlex
W2062114589
Cited by
20
References
12
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Psychoanalysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
child abuse, abusive families, personality development, parental narcissism, projective identification, currency devaluation, paranoid personality, antisocial personality, borderline personality, individuation, RAGE
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Borderline Personality Disorder, Child, Child Abuse, Depressive Disorder, Ego, Humans, Individuation, Object Attachment, Parent-Child Relations, Personality Development, Psychoanalytic Theory, Psychoanalytic Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abusive families and character formation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf01250913
The paper
McCarthy, J. B. (1990). Abusive families and character formation. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01250913