Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 36Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Creatine kinase isoenzymes in the diagnosis of intestinal infarction

Fried, Michael W., Murthy, Uma K., Hassig, Steven R., Woo, Jannie, Oates, Richard P.·1991·Digestive Diseases and Sciences
DOI 10.1007/bf01296402
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Total creatine kinase and its isoenzymes CK-MB and CK-BB were measured in the serum of patients admitted with acute abdominal pain or signs suggestive of an intraabdominal catastrophe. Total creatine kinase was measured by automated spectrophotometry, CK-MB by chemiluminescent assay, and CK-BB by radioimmunoassay. Patients were grouped according to their final diagnosis: intestinal infarction (N = 8); all other diagnoses (N = 22); controls (N = 20). CK-BB in the infarction group (22.3 +/- 5.3 ng/ml, mean +/- SE) was significantly greater (P less than 0.01) than in the noninfarction or the control groups (11.0 +/- 0.8 ng/ml and 5.8 +/- 0.7 ng/ml, respectively). There were no differences in total creatine kinase and CK-MB in the three groups. Stepwise deletion multiple regression analysis of 26 independent regressors showed that among a cluster of six significant variables (R2 = 0.92, P less than 0.005), CK-BB greater than 20 ng/ml was the best predictor of intestinal infarction. Results of this study indicate that CK-BB isoenzyme measurement may be useful in the diagnosis of intestinal infarction in man.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01296402

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lang H (ed): Creatine Kinase Isoenzymes, Pathophysiology and Clinical Applications. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1981

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Fried, M. W., Murthy, U. K., Hassig, S. R., Woo, J., & Oates, R. P.
Affiliations
State University of New York (US)
ORCID
Oates, Richard P.
Venue
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1991-11
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1589-1593
ISSN
  • 0163-2116 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2568
DOI
10.1007/bf01296402
OpenAlex
W2078178089
Cited by
36
References
16
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Digestive Diseases and Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
creatine kinase isoenzymes, CK-BB, CK-MB, intestinal infarction, acute abdominal pain, serum biomarkers, diagnostic biomarkers, multiple regression prediction
MeSH terms
Adult, Creatine Kinase, Clinical Enzyme Tests, Humans, Infarction, Intestinal Diseases, Isoenzymes, Regression Analysis, Sensitivity and Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.