Markovian master equations. II
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The pre-final master equation does not yet warrant complete positivity in the evolution.
“The last equation does not yet warrant complete positivity in the evolution [8], and so we need to perform one final approximation.”
From Markovian master equations: a critical study (2010) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 269
- Authors
- Davies, E. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, E. B.
- ORCID
- Davies, E. B.
- Venue
- Mathematische Annalen
- Published
- 1976-06
- Volume
- 219
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-158
- ISSN
- 0025-5831 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1807
- OpenAlex
- W2913334907
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mathematische Annalen (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Advanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
- Keywords
- Markovian master equation, weak coupling limit, exponential decay
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
