Über die Bausteine der mathematischen Logik

Schönfinkel, M.·1924·Mathematische Annalen

DOI 10.1007/bf01448013

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01448013

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

A formulation of the simple theory of types
Church, A. (1940) · Journal of Symbolic Logic · doi:10.2307/2266170 · Cited by 1,903
The Nature of Computation
Moore, C., & Mertens, S. (2011) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233212.001.0001 · Cited by 347
A model of conceptual bootstrapping in human cognition
Zhao, B., Lucas, C. G., & Bramley, N. R. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01719-1 · Cited by 30
Dissociating Artificial Intelligence from Artificial Consciousness
Findlay, G., Marshall, W., Albantakis, L., David, I., Mayner, W. G., Koch, C., & Tononi, G. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.04571 · Cited by 41
“Turing completeness can be achieved using radically different substrates [72–75], whether simple [46, 76] or complex, feedfor-ward [77] or recurrent [78, 79].”

Authors: Schönfinkel, M.
Venue: Mathematische Annalen
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 1924-09
Volume: 92
Issue: 3-4
Pages: 305-316
ISSN: 0025-5831 (ISSN-L)
1432-1807
DOI: 10.1007/bf01448013
OpenAlex: W159082583
Cited by: 471
References: 0
FWCI: 0.00
Type: journal article
Language: de
Open access: closed
Licence: www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (tdm)
www.springernature.com/gp/researchers/text-and-data-mining (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review