An analysis of approximations for maximizing submodular set functions—I
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Submodular maximization (from the classical greedy analysis of Nemhauser-Wolsey-Fisher [12]) underpins cache and content placement [20]; the matroid-constrained guarantees we invoke are due to Fisher-Nemhauser-Wolsey [54] (combinatorial greedy, 1/2), Calinescu-Chekuri-Pál-Vondrák [53] (continuous greedy, 1-1/e), and, for the matroid-plus-knapsack case, Lee-Mirrokni-Nagarajan-Sviridenko [62] (local
“Submodular maximization (from the classical greedy analysis of Nemhauser-Wolsey-Fisher [12]) underpins cache and content placement [20]; the matroid-constrained guarantees we invoke are due to Fisher-Nemhauser-Wolsey [54] (combinatorial greedy, 1 2 ), Calinescu-Chekuri-Pál-Vondrák [53] (continuous greedy, 1 -1 /e ), and, for the matroid-plus-knapsack case, Lee-Mirrokni-Nagarajan-Sviridenko [62] (”
From Janus: Joint Prefill/Decode Disaggregation with KV-Cache-Aware Multi-Cloud Routing for Edge-Adjacent LLM Serving (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
Our drift-plus-penalty machinery is classical [13]; the contribution is composing it with submodular prefix placement [12, 53, 54], a combination we have not seen analyzed.
“Our drift-pluspenalty machinery is classical [13]; the contribution is composing it with submodular prefix placement [12, 53, 54], a combination we have not seen analyzed.”
From Janus: Joint Prefill/Decode Disaggregation with KV-Cache-Aware Multi-Cloud Routing for Edge-Adjacent LLM Serving (2026) · cites this paper as [12]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 16 · Cited by 4,412
- Authors
- Nemhauser, G. L., Wolsey, L. A., & Fisher, M. L.
- Affiliations
- UCLouvain (BE)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Venue
- Mathematical Programming
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 265-294
- ISSN
- 0025-5610 (ISSN-L)
- 1436-4646
- OpenAlex
- W1680189815
- Cited by
- 4,412
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 231 · 2025: 201 · 2024: 194 · 2023: 258 · 2022: 266 · 2021: 354 · 2020: 346 · 2019: 323 · 2018: 318 · 2017: 287 · 2016: 279 · 2015: 273 · 2014: 243 · 2013: 179 · 2012: 159
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Mathematical Programming (publishedVersion)
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Optimization and Search Problems
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics › Advanced Combinatorial Mathematics
- Keywords
- submodular functions, approximation algorithms, combinatorial optimization, matroid optimization, maximum weight independent set, greedy algorithm, linear programming relaxation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review