Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 649Logic and Philosophy of SciencePhilosophy of Biology and Scientific ExplanationInterdisciplinary Research and Collaboration

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Science and trans-science

Weinberg, Alvin M.·1972·Minerva

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01682418

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Items 301–400 of 649

Metadata

Authors
Weinberg, A. M.
Corresponding author
Weinberg, Alvin M.
Venue
Minerva
Published
1972-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
209-222
ISSN
  • 0026-4695 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-1871
OpenAlex
W3021975292
Cited by
624
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 20
FWCI
38.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Minerva (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Logic and Philosophy of Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
Keywords
trans-science, science, philosophy of science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.