Cited by 25Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac pacing and defibrillation studies

Ultrastructure of electrophysiologically identified human sinoatrial nodes

Lowe, J. E., Hartwich, T., Takla, M., Schaper, J.·1988·Basic Research in Cardiology

Abstract

The ultrastructure of freshly excised human sinus node tissue was studied. In three female patients (ages 20, 30, and 36 years) medically refractory disabling episodes of inappropriate sinus tachycardia were surgically treated by extirpation of the sinus node. Each patient underwent intraoperative electrophysiological mapping to determine the area of earliest atrial activation. This area corresponded anatomically to the region of the sinoatrial node and was excised in each patient, the defect repaired using a pericardial patch. The freshly excised SA nodes underwent ultrastructural study. Three types of myocardial cells were identified: pacemaker or polygonal cells with clear cytoplasm, few mitochondria and sparse numbers of contractile elements (P cells); a transitional cell with slightly increased numbers of myofibrils (T cells); and typical atrial myocardial cells with normal numbers of contractile elements. These cell types have previously been identified in post-mortem studies of presumed SA node. The current study confirms the cell types in electrophysiologically documented SA nodes. The one abnormal finding observed in transitional cells in all patients was an increased number of lipofuscin-laden vacuoles. These vacuoles are considered a sign of cell degeneration and their occurrence was totally unexpected in these young adults. In summary, ultrastructural study of electrophysiologically documented human SA nodes confirmed the cell types identified in post-mortem studies. Furthermore, lipofuscin-laden vacuoles were increased in these three patients and this finding may serve as an ultrastructural marker associated with the syndrome of inappropriate sinus tachycardia.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02005826

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 25

Authors
Lowe, J. E., Hartwich, T., Takla, M., & Schaper, J.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Basic Research in Cardiology
Published
1988-07
Volume
83
Issue
4
Pages
401-409
ISSN
  • 0003-9217 (ISSN-L)
  • 0300-8428
  • 1435-1803
OpenAlex
W2016814507
Cited by
25
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Basic Research in Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL32086, HL09315, HL 17678)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Keywords
sinoatrial node, ultrastructure, pacemaker cells, transitional cells, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, cell degeneration
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Microscopy, Electron, Myocardium, Sinoatrial Node, Tachycardia, Sinus, Tachycardia, Supraventricular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review