Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13scientometrics and bibliometrics researchPsychology Research and BibliometricsWeb visibility and informetrics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Article-by-article citation analysis of medical journals

Shaw, J. G.·1987·Scientometrics
DOI 10.1007/bf02016692
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02016692

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Shaw, J. G.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
Shaw, J. G.
Venue
Scientometrics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1987-07
Volume
12
Issue
1-2
Pages
101-110
ISSN
  • 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
  • 1588-2861
DOI
10.1007/bf02016692
OpenAlex
W2021392197
Cited by
13
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
Scientometrics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
Keywords
citation patterns, medical journals, journal comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.