The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patent statistics as indicators of innovative activities: Possibilities and problems
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Cited by
The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983
Pavitt, K., Robson, M., & Townsend, J. (1987) · The Journal of Industrial Economics · doi:10.2307/2098636 · Cited by 721
Self-citationPatents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature
Basberg, B. L. (1987) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(87)90027-8 · Cited by 677
Boschma, R., Balland, P.-A., & Kogler, D. F. (2015) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/dtu012 · Cited by 477
Patents as a Measure of Innovative Activity
J. Acs, Z., & Audretsch, D. B. (1989) · Kyklos · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6435.1989.tb00186.x · Cited by 441
Belderbos, R., Cassiman, B., Faems, D., Leten, B., & Van Looy, B. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.013 · Cited by 351
Metadata
- Authors
- Pavitt, K.
- Venue
- Scientometrics
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 77-99
- ISSN
- 0138-9130 (ISSN-L)
- 1588-2861
- OpenAlex
- W2089302091
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
