The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rejection of host plant by larvae of cabbage butterfly: Diet-dependent sensitivity to an antifeedant
Abstract
Garden nasturtium,Tropaeolum majus (Tropaeolaceae), is an acceptable host plant for the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae. Eggs are readily laid on the plant and hatching larvae feed and develop into normal pupae and adults. However, when second- to fifth-instar larvae were transferred from cabbage to nasturtium, they refused to feed and starved to death. Similar results were obtained when larvae were transferred from other host plants to nasturtium. However, larvae that were reared on nasturtium readily accepted cabbage as a new host plant. We have demonstrated the presence of strong antifeedants in nasturtium foliage and identified the most prominent active compound as chlorogenic acid. However, larvae reared on nasturtium had limited sensitivity, and larvae reared on a wheat germ diet were completely insensitive to the antifeedants. Larvae apparently develop sensitivity to the deterrent as a result of feeding on other host plants, whereas continuous exposure to the deterrent causes habituation or suppression of sensitivity development. The results demonstrate that dietary experience can dramatically affect the response of an insect to a potentially antifeedant compound in a plant.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which is usually associated with a low-quality host or hosts with higher defenses90–92.”
From Atmospheric cold plasma alters plant traits and negatively affects the growth and development of fall armyworm in rice (2025) · cites this paper as [90]
Citations
Cites
Chun, M. (1972) · Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling · Cited by 171
Leaf surface chemicals stimulating oviposition byPieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cabbage
Renwick, J. A. A., Radke, C. D., Sachdev-Gupta, K., et al. (1992) · Chemoecology · doi:10.1007/bf01261454 · Cited by 148
Self-citationMETABOLIC COST OF CHANGES IN DIET AND NEUTRALIZATION OF ALLELOCHEMICS
Schoonhoven, L. M., & Meerman, J. C. (1978) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1978.tb02833.x · Cited by 105
A study of behavioural habituation to a feeding deterrent in nymphs of Schistocerca gregaria
Szentesi, Á., & Bernays, E. A. (1984) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1984.tb00714.x · Cited by 101
Chemoreception of phenolic acids and flavonoids in larvae of two species of Pieris
van Loon, J. J. A. (1990) · Journal of Comparative Physiology A · doi:10.1007/bf00187336 · Cited by 101
Scriber, J. M. (1982) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1982.tb03161.x · Cited by 78
Städler, E., & Hanson, F. E. (1978) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1978.tb00142.x · Cited by 75
LOSS OF HOSTPLANT SPECIFICITY BY MANDUCA SEXTA AFTER REARING ON AN ARTIFICIAL DIET
Schoonhoven, L. M. (1967) · Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata · doi:10.1111/j.1570-7458.1967.tb00065.x · Cited by 74
McGuire, T. R. (1984) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01065445 · Cited by 56
Comparative Studies on Induction of Food Choice Preferences in Lepidopterous Larvae
Hanson, F. E. (1976) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-4274-8_10 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bell, R.A., Owens, C.D., Shapiro, M., andTardif, J.R. 1979. Development of mass rearing technology, pp. 599–633,in C.C. Doane and M.L. McManus (eds.). The Gypsy Moth: Research Toward Integrated Pest Management. USDA-FS Technical Bulletin 1584.
- Boodley, J.W., andSheldrake, R. 1977. Cornell peat-lite mixes for commercial plant growing.Cornell Info. Bull. 42:1–8.
- Johansson, A.S. 1951. The food plant preference of the larvae ofPieris brassicae L. (Lepid., Pieridae).Norsk Entomol. Tidsskr. 8:187–195.
- Schoonhoven, L.M. 1969. Sensitivity changes in some insect chemoreceptors and their effect on food selection behavior.Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. Ser. C. 72:491–498.
- Szentesi, A., andJermy, T. 1989. The role of experience in host plant choice by phytophagous insects, pp. 39–74,in E.A. Bernays (ed.). Insect-Plant Interactions, Vol. II. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dilip, D., Modupalli, N., Rahman, M. M., & Kariyat, R. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-87560-0 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Renwick, J. A. A., & Huang, X. P.
- Affiliations
- Boyce Thompson Institute (US)
- ORCID
- Renwick, J. A. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Chemical Ecology
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-475
- ISSN
- 0098-0331 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-1561
- OpenAlex
- W2009019021
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Chemical Ecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Syracuse University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
- Keywords
- small white butterfly, Tropaeolum majus, antifeedants, chlorogenic acid, larval nutrition, habituation, plant-insect interactions, host plant acceptance, wheat germ diet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review