The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study was designed to identify factors associated with pelvic pouch failure. METHOD: A retrospective review of patients undergoing the pelvic pouch procedure with a minimum of 30 months follow-up was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 551 patients had pelvic pouch procedures from 1981 to 1992. Forty-nine patients (8.8 percent) have undergone pouch excision, and 9 (1.6 percent) have been defunctioned, for 58 (10.5 percent) patients with pouch failure. Cause of failure was leakage from the ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) in 21 (39 percent) patients, poor functional results in 13 (23 percent), pouchitis in 7 (12 percent), pouch leakage in 7 (12 percent), perianal disease in 7 (12 percent), and miscellaneous in 3 (5.2 percent). Nine of 22 patients (41 percent) had pouch failure during the first two years, with 2 of 147 patients (1 percent) having failure during the last two years of the study. The 58 patients whose pouches failed (Group 1) were compared with the 493 patients whose pouches did not fail (Group 2). Handsewn IAA (P < 0.001), tension on the IAA (P < 0.001), use of a defunctioning ileostomy (P < 0.01), a diagnosis of Crohn's disease (P < 0.001), and a leak from the pouch (P < 0.001) or the IAA (P < 0.001) were associated with pouch failure. Pouchitis was not a risk factor. CONCLUSION: The majority of pouch failures were caused by leaks at the IAA. Although the leak rate remained stable, leaks following a stapled anastomosis seemed to have a better prognosis than leaks following a handsewn anastomosis. Experience with the pouch procedure and the management of complications likely plays an important role in decreasing the risk of pouch failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European evidence based consensus on surgery for ulcerative colitis
Øresland, T., Bemelman, W. A., Sampietro, G. M., Spinelli, A., Windsor, A., Ferrante, M., Marteau, P., Zmora, O., Kotze, P. G., Espin-Basany, E., et al. (2015) · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · doi:10.1016/j.crohns.2014.08.012 · Cited by 353
Long-Term Failure After Restorative Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
Tulchinsky, H., Hawley, P. R., & Nicholls, J. (2003) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000082121.84763.4c · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- MacRae, H. M., McLeod, R. S., Cohen, Z., O'Connor, B. I., & Ton, E. N. C.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 1997-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-262
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965247466
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02050412
- The paper
- MacRae, H. M., McLeod, R. S., Cohen, Z., O'Connor, B. I., & Ton, E. N. C. (1997). Risk factors for pelvic pouch failure. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02050412
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.