The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preliminary results of preoperative 5-fluorouracil, low-dose leucovorin, and concurrent radiation therapy for clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer
Abstract
PURPOSE: We report the downstaging, sphincter preservation, acute toxicity, and preliminary local control and survival results of preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), low-dose leucovorin (LV), and concurrent radiation therapy followed by postoperative LV/5-FU for treatment of patients with clinically resectable T3 rectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients received two monthly cycles of preoperative LV/5-FU (bolus daily X 5). Radiation therapy (5,040 cGy) began concurrently on day 1. Postoperatively, patients received a median of two monthly cycles of LV/5-FU (range, 0-10). RESULTS: The complete response rate was 9 percent pathologic and 13 percent clinical, for a total of 22 percent. Total Grade 3+ acute toxicity during the preoperative combined modality segment was 25 percent (8/32). Of the 20 patients who were thought to initially require an abdominoperineal resection and for whom the intent of treatment was sphincter preservation, 17 (85 percent) were able to undergo sphincter-preserving surgery. With a median follow-up of 22 (3-59) months, none have developed local failure, and the three-year actuarial disease-free survival rate was 60 percent. CONCLUSION: Our data reveal encouraging downstaging, sphincter preservation and acute toxicity with this regimen. Additional follow-up is needed to assess the long-term local control and survival rates.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adjuvant Therapy for Patients With Colon and Rectal Cancer
(1990) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03450110090034 · Cited by 1,086
Cited by
Vecchio, F. M., Valentini, V., Minsky, B. D., Padula, G. D. A., Venkatraman, E. S., Balducci, M., Miccichè, F., Ricci, R., Morganti, A. G., Gambacorta, M. A., et al. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.11.017 · Cited by 423
Self-citationGuillem, J. G., Chessin, D. B., Cohen, A. M., Shia, J., Mazumdar, M., Enker, W., Paty, P. B., Weiser, M. R., Klimstra, D., Saltz, L., et al. (2005) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000161980.46459.96 · Cited by 386
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Grann, A., Minsky, B. D., Cohen, A. M., Saltz, L., Guillem, J. G., Paty, P. B., Kelsen, D. P., Kemeny, N., Ilson, D., & Bass-Loeb, J.
- Venue
- Diseases of the Colon & Rectum
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 515-522
- ISSN
- 0012-3706 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063655425
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.